Press ReleaseBlog PostNews Clipping

Judge Delays Google Books Hearing


Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:32 am

    A New York judge has put Google’s vision of creating the world’s biggest digital library on hold.

    Judge Denny Chin postponed a fairness hearing set for next month that
    was meant to address a settlement between Google and authors and

    The $125 million agreement, worked out last year, has effectively been sent back to the drawing board by the judge.

    The class action case would let Google distribute and sell digital versions of out of print, copyrighted books.

    It has been criticised because some say it would give Google too much power to set book prices.

    Judge Chin’s decision comes after the American Association of
    Publishers and the Authors Guild asked the court to delay the final
    fairness hearing on the proposed agreement, which needs court approval
    to go ahead.

    ‘Fair concerns’

    The move follows objections filed by the Department of Justice last
    week. It said the deal should not go through in its current form.

    In a 32-page filing, the DOJ said the settlement needed to be reworked
    so that it complied with US copyright and antitrust laws.

    It was revealed earlier this week that publishers,
    authors and Google have been working to modify the agreement, which was
    completed last year.

    "Under all the circumstances, it makes no sense to
    conduct a hearing on the fairness and reasonableness of the current
    settlement agreement, as it does not appear that the current settlement
    will be the operative one," Judge Chin wrote.

    He noted that objectors to the settlement include
    "countries, states, non-profit organisations, and prominent authors and
    law professors".

    "Clearly, fair concerns have been raised. It would
    appear that if a fair and reasonable settlement can be struck, the
    public would benefit," said Judge Chin.

    ‘Status conference’

    In 2001, book authors and the Authors Guild filed a class-action
    lawsuit, as did publishers, alleging that Google had violated copyright
    laws by scanning books from the libraries of major universities without
    always getting permission from the copyright owners of the books.

    Google claimed at the time it was protected by the
    "fair use" principle because its book search engine showed only short
    snippets of text for the books it had scanned without permission.

    Microsoft, Amazon and Yahoo have filed objections to
    the settlement with the court, along with the French and German
    governments, privacy advocates and consumer watchdog groups.

    "Clearly voices such as ours had an impact on Judge
    Chin," wrote consumer watchdog advocate John Simpson in an email to BBC

    "There was no way the proposed settlement could go
    forward. We believe that the proper place to solve many of the case’s
    thorniest problems, such as that of orphan books, is in Congress
    because it is important to build digital libraries."

    Orphan books – of which there are thought to be five million – are titles where the authors cannot be found.

    Judge Chin has called for a "status conference" to be held on 7 October
    – the original date for the hearing – to determine "how to proceed with
    the case as expeditiously as possible".

    , ,

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。