Consumer Watchdog Tells DMV Police Must Investigate Robot Car Crashes

Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:57 am

    Consumer Watchdog Tells DMV Police Must Investigate Robot Car Crashes

    Crash Data And Video Should Be Provided To Department For Release To Public, Group Says

    SANTA MONICA, CA – Consumer Watchdog today called on the California Department of Motor Vehicles to amend its Autonomous Vehicle Regulation to require that police investigate any crashes of robot cars being tested on public roads.

    In addition the DMV should require that any data and video gathered by a robot car just before and during a crash should be provided to the department, the nonpartisan nonprofit public interest group said. The video and data – with personally identifying information redacted – should be released to the public.

    “The robot car accident reports are prepared and filed by the company doing the testing. Inevitably the companies will present their version of what happened in any crash in the best possible light,” wrote John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project director. “Relying solely on the word of the testing company is not adequate to protect the legitimate public interest in ensuring robot cars are tested safely.”

    Read Consumer Watchdog’s letter to Jean Shiomoto, director of the Department of Motor Vehicles here:

    Consumer Watchdog said police should interview drivers and witnesses and file an independent report about any incident.  Since Google began testing its robot cars six years ago, its vehicles have been involved in 15 accidents.  Delphi has been in one one crash.

    Consumer Watchdog noted that the Autonomous Vehicle Regulations also require the companies testing robot cars to file reports about every instance when a human driver had to take control of the car.  The first such “disengagement” reports are due Jan. 1, 2016.  Consumer Watchdog said those reports must be released to the public.

    “Google’s cars have been involved in the most crashes – 15 – perhaps because they have the most vehicles on public roads. Under the current reporting system the DMV – and the public – must rely entirely on the Internet giant’s version of what happened,” Simpson wrote. “There is no independent third-party verification.  ‘Trust us, we’re Google’ simply isn’t good enough when our public highways become the company’s laboratory.”

    As of Aug. 14 there were nine companies with 78 robot cars and 311 drivers approved for testing on California roads, according to the DMV. They are: Volkswagen with three cars and 30 drivers, Mercedes Benz with five cars and 13 drivers, Google with 48 cars (including 25 prototype cars) and 191 drivers, Delphi with two cars and nine drivers, Tesla with 12 cars and16 drivers, Bosch LLC  with two cars and 20 drivers, Nissan with three cars and 20 drivers, Cruise Automation with two cars and 11 drivers, and BMW with one car and one driver.

    – 30 –

    Visit our website at

    , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。