Consumer Watchdog Urges Europe To File Antitrust Charges Against Google

Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:45 am

    Consumer Watchdog Urges Europe To File Antitrust Charges Against Google

    SANTA MONICA, CA – Consumer Watchdog today called on European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager to file formal charges against Google in the European Commission’s ongoing antitrust investigation of the Internet giant.

    The nonpartisan, nonprofit U.S. public interest group said the former Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia’s efforts to reach a deal without filing formal charges produced three unacceptable proposals.

    In a letter to Vestager, John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project director wrote:

    “Without a formal Statement of Objections to motivate Google, the company simply engages in lengthy settlement talks and continues its abusive anticompetitive behavior.  If nothing else, a Statement of Objections will concentrate Google executives’ minds and prompt serious negotiations.  If the Internet giant fails to give an adequate response, the path is open to force changes and levy substantial fines.”

    Read Consumer Watchdog’s letter here:

    Consumer Watchdog said consumer welfare must be the ultimate test of any antitrust settlement and noted that consumer groups on both side of the Atlantic – BEUC and Consumer Watchdog – had objected to all three previous proposed settlement deals.

    “They simply did not resolve the fundamental issue of search manipulation.  The heart of the problem is simple. Google has developed a substantial conflict of interest,” wrote Simpson.  “It no longer has an incentive to steer users to other sites, but rather favors its own services.”

    The only way to deal with this conflict is to remove it, Consumer Watchdog said.

    “Ideally, there needs to be a separation of Google’s different services and assets,” wrote Simpson. “At a minimum any remedy must insist that Google use an objective, nondiscriminatory mechanism to rank and display all search results – including links to Google products.”

    “Three failed settlement proposals from Google during your predecessor’s tenure demonstrate the futility of proceeding without a Statement of Objections. Consumer Watchdog calls on you to file a formal Statement of Objections and commence antitrust proceedings,” Consumer Watchdog’s letter concluded.


    Visit our website at

    , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。