Consumer Watchdog Calls On FCC Not To Back Down From Regulating Google And Other “Edge Provider” Connections To Internet In Wake Of Lobbying By Internet Giant

Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:26 pm

    SANTA MONICA, CA – The Federal Communication Commission should protect consumer privacy and regulate connections between the Internet and so-called “edge providers,” like Google, when the agency begins regulating broadband service like a public utility, Consumer Watchdog said today.

    An FCC fact sheet about Chairman Tom Wheeler’s plans to reclassify broadband service said he intends to give the Commission authority “allowing it to address issues that may arise in the exchange of traffic between mass-market broadband providers and edge providers.”

    Google lobbied the FCC, according to a filing last week, saying “the Commission should not attempt to classify a ‘service that broadband providers make available to ‘edge providers.’”

    “Google is too big a goliath to escape FCC scrutiny of how it connects to the Internet,” said John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project director. “Google is two-faced. They’ve actively cultivated the public image of supporting net neutrality, but when the new rules would directly affect them, Google works behind the scenes to kill them.”

    The Commission is expected to approve new rules at its meeting Thursday that would ensure net neutrality – the idea that all data traveling on the Internet is treated equally. Broadband service would be reclassified as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act and regulated like the phone company.  The FCC would “forbear” from enforcing provisions off the Act that are no longer in the public interest because of changes in technology.

    Read the FCC factsheet here: https://www.fcc.gov/document/chairman-wheeler-proposes-new-rules-protecting-open-internet

    Read Google’s filing about it lobbying here: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001019059

    -30-

    Visit our website at www.consumerwatchdog.org

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.


    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。