Tech Companies Continue Pumping Millions Into Lobbying As Google Tops $3 Million, Facebook Spending Rises 10 Percent, Microsoft Posts Record $2.96 Million For Quarter

Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:59 am

    Tech Companies Continue Pumping Millions Into Lobbying As Google Tops $3 Million, Facebook Spending Rises 10 Percent, Microsoft Posts Record $2.96 Million For Quarter

    WASHINGTON, DC – Technology companies continued to pump money into their lobbying efforts during the second quarter, with Google leading the pack spending $3.36 million on its effort to buy influence with federal legislators and policymakers, according to disclosure forms filed with the Clerk of the House of Representatives.

    Microsoft spent $2.96 million in the second quarter, a company record, and up 47 percent from $2.01 million in the second quarter of 2012, the records filed on Monday show.

    Google’s spending declined 14 percent from the record level of 2012 when it spent $3.92 million in the second quarter.  During that year it was facing an antitrust investigation by the Federal Trade Commission.

    Facebook spent $1.06 million a 10 percent increase from $960,000 in the second quarter of 2012.

    “These lobbying expenditures are a sad commentary on the state of our democracy,” said John M. Simpson, director of Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Policy. “Policymaking in Washington is all about who has the money and is willing to spend it.”

    Google’s lobbying expenses topped telecommunications giant Verizon who spent $3.24 million a decrease of 17 percent from $3.94 million in 2012.  It almost matched AT&T’s effort of $3.74 million, an increase of 7 percent from $3.48 million in 2012.

    Other tech company second quarter lobbying expenditures as disclosed to the Clerk of the House of Representatives:

    — Amazon spent $860,000, an increase of 25 percent from $690,000 in 2012.

    — Apple spent $690,000, an increase of 47 percent from $470,000 in 2012.

    — IBM spent $1.9 million, an increase of 90 percent from $1 million in 2012.

    — Oracle spent $1.66 million, an increase of 13 percent from $1.47 million in 2012.

    -30-

    Visit our website at www.consumerwatchdog.org

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.


    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。