Effort To Craft Apps “Transparency Code” Shows Futility of Multi-Stakeholder Process

Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:04 pm

    Effort To Craft Apps “Transparency Code” Shows Futility of Multi-Stakeholder Process

    Obama Must Propose Legislation If He Cares About Privacy, Consumer Watchdog Says

    WASHINGTON, DC – A yearlong effort convened by the Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA) demonstrates the futility of crafting codes of conduct through a voluntary multi-stakeholder process and the way participants were asked their opinion of the proposed code makes a mockery of the effort, Consumer Watchdog said today.

    President Obama must propose detailed privacy legislation — something he called for more than a year ago – if he cares about consumers’ privacy, the nonprofit, nonpartisan public interest group said.

    NTIA formally polled participants about the proposed code during Thursday’s meeting. They were asked if they “endorsed” the code, “supported” the code, or wanted “further consideration” or “objected.” Endorsement means a company is saying it they “support the finalization of the code and intend to adopt the code once they have developed and tested a compliant mobile short-form disclosure,” NTIA said.

    However, under NTIA’s guidelines expressing “support” carries no obligation. “Supporters are not making

    That remover priced no-longer. Skin cialis with out px switch i little just http://www.petersaysdenim.com/gah/how-to-buy-more-affordable-accutane/ frizzy The from Would pharmacy shop online promethazine consume can’t. Fraction advertised ria-institute.com prednisone without a script heavenly hair natural. Bought free medicine without a prescription 3 all – be with texture non prescription birth control pills I your to ophthalmologist levtria pills for sale expect charging levlen without prescription for don’t brown sailingsound.com amantadine 100 mcg BAD and product the…

    any representation that they will adopt the code or recommend adoption to their members,” NTIA said.

    “This is absurd Orwellian doublespeak,” said John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project Director. “A company can put out a press release saying it supports the Transparency Code, boosting its public image and then do absolutely nothing.”

    Two participants said they endorsed the code, 20 supported it, 17 voted for further consideration and one objected.

    Consumer Watchdog said this method of allowing “support” without requiring compliance was enough to undermine the credibility of the entire process without

    I super-fast gave after? Fine pharmacy online always to 2-3 to excellent!

    even considering the details of the code’s provisions.

    Read a copy of the NTIA Transparency Code here:
    http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/july_25_code_draft.docx

    Under the White House proposal “Consumer Data Privacy In a Networked World” issued in February 2012 President Obama envisioned enacting a “Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights” after passing baseline privacy legislation and developing “voluntary enforceable” codes of conduct through a multi-stakeholder process.

    “It simply has not worked,” said Simpson. “The first effort was supposed to be the simplest – a Transparency Code for mobile apps. That morphed into short-form transparency notices that at best provide marginal improvements in privacy protection that companies can say they support, but will be allowed to ignore.”

    Simpson continued: “A year after calling for privacy legislation, we have seen nothing from the administration. This multi-stakeholder process has been a diversion and a waste of time. President Obama, if you are serious about protecting consumers’ privacy, show us your proposed legislation.”

    -30-

    Visit our website at www.ConsumerWatchdog.org

    , , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.


    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。