ugg online shop sale ugg online shop sale ugg online shop sale adidas online store outlet adidas online store outlet adidas online store outlet coach bags buy online coach bags buy online coach bags buy online cheap ray ban sunglasses cheap ray ban sunglasses cheap ray ban sunglasses louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop buy louis vuitton bags online buy louis vuitton bags online buy louis vuitton bags online louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop tory burch sale reebok pas cher nike air max 90 comprar nike air max 90

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-includes/class-theme.php(9) : runtime-created function on line 63

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ready-backup/classes/req.php on line 9

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ready-backup/classes/req.php on line 9
Google Said to Face Fine by U.S. Over Apple Safari Breach | Inside Google
reveal to you how to determine a faux nike shoe Share your insights and advice! This group is filled with members as interesting as they are diverse. If you want to ignore such type of mistakes, you should know how to identify a real silver ornament. I don have a big bust, but what I would suggest is to wear collared button down shirts tucked in to your skirt. Other than that, the songs are damn near identical. Your feet may be longer, your hands bigger. The suits that men wore at the beginning of the 1920s were of a conservative style. Girls have an inborn desire to get noticed with their unique fashion statement and they always remain keen to set exemplarylevels in styles. If you have any concerns about your own health or the health of your child, you should always consult with a physician or other healthcare professional. You can often find excellent deals there (and there is nothing wrong with it). Alexander proved himself as a commercially successful designer with the introduction of his widely famous "bumster" pants, named by McQueen for the extremely low cut waistline. With the exception of the Trovata suit, which ended in a mistrial, all of the lawsuits have been settled out of court. The bank is the oldest and largest bank headquartered in Philadelphia, Penn. Uncomplicated A line skirts and pants that flare from the knee are preferable, according to "The Dressmaker's Technique Bible.". The life of Joan of Arc is one of the best documented of her era. The cool thing about the online mode is that you can join games already in progress.. Since blogs are so popular these days, and traditionally offer a lower key, almost relaxed view of a photographer, this is the best place to see the real personality of your photographer. Another factor is the brand. Your pride in this profession would be that you are helping people feel better about themselves. The show has a pretty basic comedy mix to it with a good full feeling that has some minor moments of directionality when needed. Fashion and clothing are extensions of our personalities. They might sound strange but they are often dissected in the gutters. To give you a wider scope, the Ted Baker collection includes shirts, suits, trousers, sweaters, jackets, t shirts, ties, sunglasses, shoes, boots, sandals and sneakers for men. The shonen ai elements are an obvious nod to CLAMP's doujinshi fan base who thrive on it, but it also is a great comedic devise for Hokuto to play off of. A movie with lots of shots of Axel looking out of place in fancy hotels and galleries and country clubs.

News Clipping

Google Said to Face Fine by U.S. Over Apple Safari Breach


Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:08 pm

  • Share

Google Inc. (GOOG) agreed to pay $22.5 million, the largest fine ever levied by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, to settle allegations that it breached Apple Inc. (AAPL)’s Safari Internet browser.

The record fine is the FTC’s first for a violation of Internet privacy as the agency steps up enforcement of consumers’ online rights.

The FTC alleged that Mountain View, California-based Google deceived consumers and violated terms of a consent decree signed with the commission last year when it planted cookies on Safari, bypassing Apple software’s privacy settings, to track users’ Internet browsing behavior.

“The record-setting penalty in this matter sends a clear message to all companies under an FTC privacy order,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. “No matter how big or small, all companies must abide by FTC orders against them and keep their privacy promises to consumers, or they will end up paying many times what it would have cost to comply in the first place.”

Google, operator of the world’s largest Internet search engine, has drawn regulatory scrutiny and pressure from consumer advocates for the way it handles personal information. The company’s consent decree with the FTC settled allegations that it used deceptive tactics and violated its own privacy policies in introducing the Buzz social-networking service in 2010.

‘Highest Standards’

“We set the highest standards of privacy and security for our users,” Google said in an e-mail statement. “The FTC is focused on a 2009 help-center page published more than two years before our consent decree, and a year before Apple changed its cookie-handling policy. We have now changed that page and taken steps to remove the ad cookies, which collected no personal information, from Apple’s browsers.”

Consumer Watchdog, an advocacy group based in Santa Monica, California, said the fine wasn’t big enough to teach a lesson to Google, which reported net income of $9.7 billion last year and is expected to generate profit of $13.7 billion this year, according to the average estimate of 34 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg News.

‘Woefully Insufficient’

“While the $22.5 million penalty levied against Google is a record for the FTC, it is woefully insufficient considering that Google refused to admit any liability or wrongdoing,” said John Simpson, privacy project director for the public interest group.

“The commission has allowed Google to buy its way out of trouble for an amount that probably is less than the company spends on lunches for its employees and with no admission it did anything wrong,” Simpson said.

In addition to the penalty, the FTC ordered Google to disable all the tracking cookies. Most of the tracking cookies have been removed and all must be gone by February of 2014, James Kohn, the FTC’s associate director for enforcement, said on a conference call today with reporters after the announcement.

Google shares rose less than 1 percent to $643.04 at 2:34 p.m. in New York trading. The stock has declined 0.43 percent this year.

Cookies are small pieces of computer text that collect information from computers about a user’s browsing behavior and can be used to serve advertisements to consumers based on their interests as shown by the websites they visit.

Browser Settings

Google specifically told users of Apple’s Safari that because the browser is set by default to block third-party cookies, as long as users don’t change their browser settings, this setting effectively accomplishes the same thing as opting out of online tracking, according to the FTC complaint.

Google exploited an exception to the browser’s default setting to place a temporary cookie, the FTC said.

The Safari breach was first identified by Stanford researcher Jonathan Mayer, who published a blog entry on his discoveries Feb. 16. Google said at the time that it “didn’t anticipate this would happen” and that it was removing the files since discovering the slip.

The agency was investigating Google’s privacy violations before Mayer’s report was published, David Vladeck, director of the FTC’s bureau of competition, said on the conference call today. He also called Google’s response that it was unaware of the breach “troubling.”

‘Red Flag’

“Google’s defense waves a red flag to regulators,” Vladeck said. “The social contract is if you are going to hold on to people’s private data, you’ve got to do a better job of honoring your commitments.”

The cookies allowed Google to avoid Safari’s built-in privacy protections to aim targeted advertising at users of Safari on computers, laptops, iPhones and iPads.

Marc Rotenberg, president of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which filed the initial complaint in February 2010 that led to the consent decree, said “although we had previously expressed concerns about the failure of the FTC to enforce its own orders, we are pleased that the commission has now taken action to protect the privacy of Internet users.”

The FTC is charged with protecting consumers against “unfair and deceptive” practices under the law that created the agency. Last year’s 20-year settlement with Google bars the company from misrepresenting how it handles user information, and requires it to follow policies that protect consumer data in new products and to submit to regular privacy audits.

Levy Fines

The FTC has the authority to levy fines for violations of its consent decrees of as much as $16,000 a day for each violation.

“Google is paying what we think is a heavy price for violating our prior order,” Vladeck said. “We hope this sends a clear message to Google that violations of the order and failure to keep commitments on privacy is going to be punished severely. This sends the message that the FTC isn’t kidding around.”

Vladeck said that although the order didn’t involve a statement of liability, Google didn’t contest the facts laid out in the FTC complaint.

FTC Commissioner Thomas Rosch said in his dissenting statement the agency should have gotten Google to admit wrongdoing.

‘No Question’

“There is no question in my mind that there is ‘reason to believe’ that Google is in contempt of a prior commission order,” Rosch wrote. “This scenario — violation of a consent order — makes the commission’s acceptance of Google’s denial of liability all the more inexplicable.”

Rosch, one of two Republican commissioners at the FTC, said accepting the order without such an admission wasn’t in the public interest and would make it easier for other, smaller companies to do the same in the future.

Other public interest groups criticized the FTC action. Berin Szoka, president of TechFreedom and Geoffrey Manne, executive director of the International Center for Law & Economics, said in a joint e-mail statement that the FTC order amounted to “arbitrary regulation-by-settlement” that “undermines the rule of law and harms consumers by deterring privacy disclosures.”

The agency’s previous largest fine in a privacy-related case was against data broker ChoicePoint Inc. in 2006 for compromises of personal financial records of more than 163,000 consumers. ChoicePoint agreed to pay $10 million in civil penalties and $5 million in consumer redress in a settlement with the FTC.

The FTC has also entered into settlements on privacy allegations with Facebook Inc. (FB), Twitter Inc. and MySpace Inc.

To contact the reporter on this story: Sara Forden in Washington at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

nine − 3 =