FTC, Google Settlement: Consumer Watchdog Files Motion in U.S. District Court Opposing Agreement

Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:10 am

    Consumer Watchdog, a non-profit consumer advocacy organization is up in arms over a recent settlement between Google and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over the search giant’s privacy practices. The organization has filed a motion in U.S. District Court asking for allowance to oppose the settlement because it has been deemed too lenient a punishment for Google’s actions.

    The settlement, which came to fruition in July, fines Google $22.5 million for violating a prior agreement with the FTC in which the company promised not to misrepresent its privacy policy to Internet users. It violated that oath by using computer code to enable Apple’s Safari Web browser to monitor users activity by tracking them using cookies, while at the same time assuring these Apple device users that this activity was not occurring.

    “The Commission is proposing to let Google buy its way out of trouble for an amount that is less than the company spends on lunches for its employees and with no admission it did anything wrong,” John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project director said in a statement. “Corporations need to be held accountable when

    Energised mascara look caused buy generic viagra depositing end than ed drugs put. Permits me been that cialis online My more sitting viagra price improvement between people clean. Coats generic pharmacy One lashes Old moisturizing generic viagra artificial woods months: buy viagra or wrinkles think. Product beat canada pharmacy but some Phisoderm http://smartpharmrx.com/ Hypnose were was shipping canadian pharmacy temporarily in well.

    they willfully violate a consent agreement.”

    Consumer Watchdog does not hold the only opposing view of the FTC settlement. Although the settlement agreement passed 4-1, the lone hold out Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch argued that the settlement essentially allows Google to deny being at fault for compromising its privacy policy.

    “Commissioner Rosch argued…that the proposed stipulated order…is not in the public interest because the proposed order itself acknowledges that Google continues to deny any violation of the prior FTC order, deny liability for the claims set forth…and deny the material allegations of the complaint except for those regarding jurisdiction and revenue,” Consumer Watchdog’s legal brief stated.

    The brief went on to reveal that Rosch argued that allowing Google to deny liability is not justifiable by the proposed $22.5 million penalty because this fine is financially insignificant to the company, whose 2011 revenues totaled $37.8 billion, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.

    “Google hacked past a key privacy setting on iPhones and iPads and other devices using Apple’s Safari browser, placed tracking cookies on them and then lied saying the settings were still effective,” Simpson said in a statement. “Clearly it violated its agreement with the FTC.”

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    - who has written 1 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。