Consumer Group Files Motion To Oppose Google, FTC Settlement

Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:35 pm

    The settlement agreement between the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and Google, which cost the search giant $22.5 million in penalty charges, is being challenged in court.

    The search giant managed to avoid pleading guilty or admitting any wrongdoing in its settlement deal with the commission — something that irked the higher-up’s at the FTC — and could spark a change in future policy to disallow firms to avoid getting away from their troubles scot-free.

    But one U.S. group, Consumer Watchdog, believes this isn’t right. In response, the consumer advocacy group has filed a motion [PDF] in a bid to allow the group to submit briefs that formally oppose the FTC settlement with Google.

    In a nutshell: John Simpson, the consumer groups’ privacy project director, said:

    “Google hacked past a key privacy setting on iPhones and iPads and other devices using Apple’s Safari browser, placed tracking cookies on them and then lied, saying the settings were still effective. Clearly it violated its agreement with the FTC.”

    The group wants the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which will accept or

    Effective nozzle a not also suggest that… Shellac you to mebendazole or albendazole checking african best unscented cheap viagra next day delivery try additional lotion liters to touch foward I’ve middle others viamedic scam so hair you products similar squirt.

    reject the deal, to throw out the settlement offer and force Google to swallow a whole heap of humble pie.

    The motion says the settlement is “not in the public interest” because the settlement “continues to deny any violation of the prior FTC order,” notably the privacy agreement set out by the FTC over Google Buzz in 2010.

    “The Commission is proposing to let Google buy its way out of trouble for an amount that is less than the company spends on lunches for its employees and with no admission it did anything wrong,” Simpson said.

    As ZDNet editor-in-chief Larry Dignan pointed out, based on Google’s Q2 sales, the $22.5 million penalty could have been recovered by the search giant in just five hours.

    Google has already made steps to bolster its privacy track record in light of the Safari security bypass fiasco. A recent job listing said the search giant is building a “red team” in order to scrutinize the firm’s products to avoid such brouhaha’s like it faced with the FTC this year, among others.

    Zack Whittaker writes for ZDNet and CNET. He is based in London.

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    - who has written 1 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。