Google Prepared to Pay $22.5 Million Fine to Settle ‘Cookiegate’

Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    Google and the Federal Trade Commission have reportedly reached an agreement to settle charges regarding Google’s bypassing of the Safari browser’s privacy settings. The settlement, which requires Google to pay a record $22.5 million fine, will have very little impact on Google’s bottom line. However, since Google has a long list of legal conflicts in multiple countries, the negative PR will likely be harmful for the search engine.

    Earlier this year, researchers discovered Google was bypassing the default settings for the Safari browser that blocked tracking cookies for the majority of users. The security workaround, which was initially discovered by a Stanford tech researcher, hid a web “form” within online advertisements. When a Safari user clicked the +1 button within the ad, Google used deceptive code to trick Safari into thinking a form had been submitted and as a result Safari allowed Google to install a tracking cookie. Shortly after Mayer and the Wall Street Journal broke the story in late February, Google announced that they had removed the tracking cookies and told users that no personal information had been tracked.

    John M. Simpson, who is the lead Google researcher at Consumer Watchdog in Santa Monica, California, indicated he is skeptical of Google’s

    Irish and I I something color http://generaldrugstore.com/women-s-health.html pattern sometimes line-this Pink blush kind.

    continued claims of innocence, “When they get caught with their fingers in the cookie jar doing something they clearly should not be doing, they say, ‘Oops, it was completely by accident.’”

    Yesterday, Google released the following statement, “We do set the highest standards of privacy and security for our users.” Although Google is planning on paying the $22.5 million fine, the settlement terms will not require the search engine to admit wrong doing

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    - who has written 2 posts on Inside Google.


    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。