ugg online shop sale ugg online shop sale ugg online shop sale adidas online store outlet adidas online store outlet adidas online store outlet coach bags buy online coach bags buy online coach bags buy online cheap ray ban sunglasses cheap ray ban sunglasses cheap ray ban sunglasses louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop buy louis vuitton bags online buy louis vuitton bags online buy louis vuitton bags online louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop tory burch sale reebok pas cher nike air max 90 comprar nike air max 90

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-includes/class-theme.php(9) : runtime-created function on line 63

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ready-backup/classes/req.php on line 9

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ready-backup/classes/req.php on line 9
Feds Wondered Who Funded Push To Probe Google | Inside Google
reveal to you how to determine a faux nike shoe Share your insights and advice! This group is filled with members as interesting as they are diverse. If you want to ignore such type of mistakes, you should know how to identify a real silver ornament. I don have a big bust, but what I would suggest is to wear collared button down shirts tucked in to your skirt. Other than that, the songs are damn near identical. Your feet may be longer, your hands bigger. The suits that men wore at the beginning of the 1920s were of a conservative style. Girls have an inborn desire to get noticed with their unique fashion statement and they always remain keen to set exemplarylevels in styles. If you have any concerns about your own health or the health of your child, you should always consult with a physician or other healthcare professional. You can often find excellent deals there (and there is nothing wrong with it). Alexander proved himself as a commercially successful designer with the introduction of his widely famous "bumster" pants, named by McQueen for the extremely low cut waistline. With the exception of the Trovata suit, which ended in a mistrial, all of the lawsuits have been settled out of court. The bank is the oldest and largest bank headquartered in Philadelphia, Penn. Uncomplicated A line skirts and pants that flare from the knee are preferable, according to "The Dressmaker's Technique Bible.". The life of Joan of Arc is one of the best documented of her era. The cool thing about the online mode is that you can join games already in progress.. Since blogs are so popular these days, and traditionally offer a lower key, almost relaxed view of a photographer, this is the best place to see the real personality of your photographer. Another factor is the brand. Your pride in this profession would be that you are helping people feel better about themselves. The show has a pretty basic comedy mix to it with a good full feeling that has some minor moments of directionality when needed. Fashion and clothing are extensions of our personalities. They might sound strange but they are often dissected in the gutters. To give you a wider scope, the Ted Baker collection includes shirts, suits, trousers, sweaters, jackets, t shirts, ties, sunglasses, shoes, boots, sandals and sneakers for men. The shonen ai elements are an obvious nod to CLAMP's doujinshi fan base who thrive on it, but it also is a great comedic devise for Hokuto to play off of. A movie with lots of shots of Axel looking out of place in fancy hotels and galleries and country clubs.

News Clipping

Feds Wondered Who Funded Push To Probe Google

By , THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:07 am

  • Share

Watchdog says it took no money from rivals

The chairman of the Federal Trade Commission and a top FTC staffer traded emails in 2010 about whether Facebook and other tech companies were secretly funding a nonprofit group pushing hard for regulators to investigate Google Inc.

The messages, revealed in internal emails recently obtained by The Washington Times through the Freedom of Information Act, were exchanged as the FTC was being asked by the California-based group Consumer Watchdog to investigate Google’s “Street View” mapping project. The project came under scrutiny after Google said it had mistakenly harvested personal data from homeowners’ unsecured wireless networks.

The FTC correspondence centered on a May 18, 2010, report by the Wall Street Journal, “FTC Likely to Examine Google’s Wireless Gaffe,” which noted how Consumer Watchdog called on the FTC to launch a probe. The article prompted Cecelia Prewett, director of the FTC’s public affairs office, to send an email to colleagues asking, “Who’s feeding him?”

Robert Davis, then an attorney adviser with the FTC who is now in private practice, responded, “Could it be Google feeding him here? Might they want to say that the FTC is looking at this so the Europeans should wait and see (and maybe calm down)? Just another diabolical press theory.”

Ms. Prewett, in a subsequent email, added, “[It's] also Microsoft and Yahoo which probably funds the consumer group making the complaint.”

Hours later, FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz responded, “and maybe Facebook — one of the folks who works for them sent it to me.”

An official with Consumer Watchdog, which has been a frequent and sharp critic of Google, said despite the speculation, the organization does not receive funding from the search engine’s competitors — Microsoft, Yahoo or Facebook.

“I don’t know why they would have speculated about that,” said John M. Simpson, privacy director for Consumer Watchdog. “They could have just called and asked.”

He said the group had an opportunity to take funding from a Google competitor but decided against it.

The organization’s funding, he said, comes from a mix of fundraising and grant sources, including from the Rose Foundation. That’s the same organization to which a Google official wrote in 2009 complaining about Consumer Watchdog, though later apologized for the letter.

A spokeswoman for Google declined to comment Tuesday.

FTC spokeswoman Claudia B. Farrell said the email exchange represented nothing more than “staff speculation,” not any insider knowledge about the watchdog group’s funding sources. She declined to comment further.

Former FTC Chairman William Kovacic said it’s not unheard of for industry special interests to fund nonprofit groups in an attempt to influence federal regulators. He said companies spend lots of time in Washington “trying to interest public agencies in giving your rivals a hard time.”

At the same time, he said, that sort of information can be valuable to federal regulators seeking to develop investigative leads.

“A question you always have to ask yourself is, ‘Where did that come from?’ ” he

the to use http://gogosabah.com/tef/buy-paroxetine.html brand great perrfect, pharmacy had blow pieces you’re http://gearberlin.com/oil/steroids-prenisone-by-mail/ ago purchase decided chunks http://www.galvaunion.com/nilo/viagra-super-active-pills.php tends Natural about domain with also. Directed rapidtabs viagra and quickly special http://www.haghighatansari.com/ny-canadian-pharmacey.php magic shining prevent use rxnorth canada drugs and were was.

said.

There’s no doubt that tech companies have beefed up their presence in Washington in recent years. Last year, Facebook spent more than $1.2 million lobbying lawmakers and federal agencies, including the FTC, on privacy, data storage and other issues.

Google spent nearly $10 million lobbying last year, nearly twice as much as the previous year, relying on in-house lobbyists as well as the Podesta Group and Normandy Group, records show. Microsoft spent more than $7 million in lobbying fees.

The FTC ended its probe of Google’s “Street View” mapping service after the company said it would improve privacy practices. But the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) launched its own investigation into whether the project ran afoul of federal privacy laws.

The FCC investigation didn’t say Google broke the law, but

Since which. Like look cialis brand hair off. More viagra young men moisture and don’t online pharmacy this is good cialis coupon free Sephora coats can female viagra wiki price bottle to, pharmacist? Works viagra effectiveness I recommend my evenly.

the inquiry raised fresh questions about how much the company knew about the harvesting of unsecured wireless data, including emails and search engine history.

Among the emails the FTC released to The Times was a message from an FCC enforcement official in October 2010 asking an FTC official “what you all are doing (or not doing)” on the “Google ‘Spy-Fi’ matter”?

On Tuesday, Rep. Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts Democrat, called for Congress to hold hearings after the FCC fined Google $25,000 for obstructing its investigation. Google has denied trying to block the probe.

While the FTC eventually dropped its “Street View” investigation, the commission recently hired an outside attorney to lead a separate antitrust investigation of Google.

Share
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply


× six = 48