Google Bypassed Apple Privacy Settings: Researcher

Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:08 pm

    SAN FRANCISCO, CA — Google was under fire Friday after it was revealed the Internet giant’s ad-targeting “cookies” bypassed track-blocking software on Apple’s web browser for iPhones and computers.

    Snippets of code called “cookies” from Google three online ad specialty firms slipped past tracker-blocking safeguards on Apple’s Safari browser, Stanford University graduate student Jonathan Mayer said Friday in a blog post.

    “Some privacy researchers and advocates have characterized the interplay between third-party web trackers and browser privacy measures as a ‘cat and mouse game’ or ‘arms race,'” Mayer said.

    “This research result regrettably affirms that view as reality for, quite possibly, millions of users.”

    Safari is the most widely used browser on mobile devices and the default browser on iPhones and Macintosh computers. The Apple browsers are pre-set to block tracking cookies.

    Google discontinued use of the offending cookies after Mayer’s findings went public, and defended itself against outrage over what it characterized as an unintended side-effect of an effort to safeguard online privacy.

    Google last year began using cookies in Safari browsers to let people signed into Google accounts get personalized services, such as being able “+1” ads or other online content as likeable for friends at its online social network.

    Specialized cookies were crafted to be set temporarily in Safari browsers to check whether a user was signed into a Google account and had opted for personalized services such as social ads from DoubleClick.

    The plan was purportedly to provide users personalization they requested while disclosing no information about them to Google-owned ad specialty firm DoubleClick.

    Google reportedly did not realize was the presence of the cookies opened Safari browser doors to a slew of DoubleClick ad tracking cookies, which would otherwise have been rejected.

    “The Safari browser contained functionality that then enabled other Google advertising cookies to be set on the browser,” the California company said in a released statement.

    “We didn’t anticipate that this would happen, and we have now started removing these advertising cookies from Safari browsers,” it continued.

    “It’s important to stress that, just as on other browsers, these advertising cookies do not collect personal information.”

    US legislators and privacy advocates lashed out at Google, accusing the company of trampling on people’s privacy and calling for an investigation.

    “Google has clearly engaged in ‘unfair and deceptive’ practices,” said Consumer Watchdog privacy project director John Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project director.

    “They have been lying about how people can protect their privacy in their instructions about how to opt out of receiving targeted advertising.”

    Consumer Watchdog fired off a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission calling for an investigtion.

    “We are taking immediate steps to address concerns and we are happy to answer any questions regulators and others may have,” a Google spokesman told AFP.

    Senator John Rockefeller, chairman of the Committee on Science, Commerce, and Transportation, issued a statement vowing to look into how extensively Google and other firms circumvented do-not-track mechanisms in Safari browsers.

    “Google knows the rules and simply chose not to follow them in this case,” said Association for Competitive Technology president Jonathan Zuck.

    “The ongoing irony is that these missteps, intentional or otherwise, invite regulatory action that doesn’t hurt Google, but makes it harder for small business competitors to survive.”

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    - who has written 38 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。