Does Google-Motorola Pose Anti-Competitive Danger?

Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:21 am

    Does Google-Motorola Pose Anti-Competitive Danger?

    What if Google, the master of the cloud computing universe and the Internet’s information monopolist, were to buy Intel, Apple, or IBM? Would we want the company that controls information outside of our computers all along the Internet to also have control over a principal computer hardware maker and its patents?

    Anti-trust regulators looking at Google’s proposed takeover of Motorola Mobility might ask themselves the same type of question.  Do you want the mobile phone information monopolist (through its Android operating system and apps) to own a principle mobile manufacturer and its patent technology?

    To be sure, monopolies look different in the Internet age. But what Google has over all of us is the world’s largest repository of private information ever assembled because it tracks every web site we visit and every search we make.  Mobile technology allows Google to follow our physical movements through Android, Maps and Latitude, as well as our mobile behavior, images we compile on our mobile phone, and soon the faces of people we photograph.

    Should an information monopolist like Google have the power to dominate cell phone manufacturing and control patents that could require mobile phones to use its information-tracking Android operations and applications?  The debate has just begun.


    Jamie Court is the president and CEO of Consumer Watchdog.

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    Jamie Court

    - who has written 26 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    One Response to “Does Google-Motorola Pose Anti-Competitive Danger?”

    1. vsp Says:

      Google is an overgrown crybaby and is a spoilt brat. It does not know about misery because it was born with a silver spoon in its mouth. Whatever it wants it gets without any difficulty. This juvenile, in spite of adult supervision, has not grown up to be responsible. It likes to steal other’s toys, but when someone steps on its toys it shouts bloody murder and starts to throw tantrums. It also likes to destroy other’s property because it thinks it can.

      Google is in the smart phone business not because it is serious about it but it serves as a loss leader to its ads business. Google’s behavior is worse than a patent troll’s. It disrupts other’s business so that it can grow up its ads business. This is the most nefarious activity that should be banned outright (Caution: Please don’t jump to conclusion that I am against ads). It uses its monopoly in one area to leverage into other areas. This is worse than product dumping by Asian countries in mature markets. Not only is this anti-competitive, but by not charging a price for its products, it is also not operating on a level playing field. It uses foreign partners like Samsung and HTC to destroy a host country’s businesses. Google should be stopped. Google is the worst terrorist in the US.

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。