ugg online shop sale ugg online shop sale ugg online shop sale adidas online store outlet adidas online store outlet adidas online store outlet coach bags buy online coach bags buy online coach bags buy online cheap ray ban sunglasses cheap ray ban sunglasses cheap ray ban sunglasses louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop buy louis vuitton bags online buy louis vuitton bags online buy louis vuitton bags online louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop tory burch sale reebok pas cher nike air max 90 comprar nike air max 90

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-includes/class-theme.php(9) : runtime-created function on line 63

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ready-backup/classes/req.php on line 9

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ready-backup/classes/req.php on line 9
When Analysts Look Over Their Shoulders | Inside Google
reveal to you how to determine a faux nike shoe Share your insights and advice! This group is filled with members as interesting as they are diverse. If you want to ignore such type of mistakes, you should know how to identify a real silver ornament. I don have a big bust, but what I would suggest is to wear collared button down shirts tucked in to your skirt. Other than that, the songs are damn near identical. Your feet may be longer, your hands bigger. The suits that men wore at the beginning of the 1920s were of a conservative style. Girls have an inborn desire to get noticed with their unique fashion statement and they always remain keen to set exemplarylevels in styles. If you have any concerns about your own health or the health of your child, you should always consult with a physician or other healthcare professional. You can often find excellent deals there (and there is nothing wrong with it). Alexander proved himself as a commercially successful designer with the introduction of his widely famous "bumster" pants, named by McQueen for the extremely low cut waistline. With the exception of the Trovata suit, which ended in a mistrial, all of the lawsuits have been settled out of court. The bank is the oldest and largest bank headquartered in Philadelphia, Penn. Uncomplicated A line skirts and pants that flare from the knee are preferable, according to "The Dressmaker's Technique Bible.". The life of Joan of Arc is one of the best documented of her era. The cool thing about the online mode is that you can join games already in progress.. Since blogs are so popular these days, and traditionally offer a lower key, almost relaxed view of a photographer, this is the best place to see the real personality of your photographer. Another factor is the brand. Your pride in this profession would be that you are helping people feel better about themselves. The show has a pretty basic comedy mix to it with a good full feeling that has some minor moments of directionality when needed. Fashion and clothing are extensions of our personalities. They might sound strange but they are often dissected in the gutters. To give you a wider scope, the Ted Baker collection includes shirts, suits, trousers, sweaters, jackets, t shirts, ties, sunglasses, shoes, boots, sandals and sneakers for men. The shonen ai elements are an obvious nod to CLAMP's doujinshi fan base who thrive on it, but it also is a great comedic devise for Hokuto to play off of. A movie with lots of shots of Axel looking out of place in fancy hotels and galleries and country clubs.

News Clipping

When Analysts Look Over Their Shoulders

By , INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:58 am

  • Share

Precursor President Scott Cleland throws a pensive glance outside his office building in McLean, Va. AP

Precursor President Scott Cleland throws a pensive glance outside his office building in McLean, VA (AP) View Enlarged Image

Scott Cleland is one tough Google critic.

From his office in McLean, Va., as founder and president of research firm Precursor, Cleland routinely fires off pages of analysis whenever news on Google’s market dominance hits the media.

Cleland’s words have irked Google, which is engaging in an unusual behind-the-scenes effort to counter Cleland’s views. The case is spotlighting the issue of how companies should deal with critics on the public stage.

Like in all confrontations, there are two sides to this face-off.

Cleland’s testified several times before Congress on the issue of Google’s market dominance. He says he helped get the Department of Justice to oppose a proposed online advertising deal between Google and Yahoo in 2008, among other achievements.

“I was influential in getting many to see why Google was on a path to become a monopoly … and why Yahoo and Microsoft were weak, part-time competitors,” Cleland said.

Google’s Side

Google sees it from another view. It says Cleland is a hired gun paid by Microsoft, AT&T, Time Warner Cable and others “for the express purpose of slinging dirt against Google, so they don’t have to do it themselves,” wrote Adam Kovacevich, Google’s senior manager for global communications and public affairs, in an e-mail to IBD.

“We get criticism every day,” Kovacevich wrote, “and while we might disagree with our critics, most of them are independent and thoughtful. But I think everyone understands that Scott is paid by Microsoft and AT&T to criticize us so those companies don’t have to do it themselves. It does a disservice to pretend otherwise.”

To get its point across about Cleland, Google for over two years has routinely sent out e-mails to journalists who quote him.

“I have been told by multiple news organizations of the bullying and intimidation they receive to not quote me,” said Cleland.

Experts in public relations offer all kinds of advice on how to deal with harsh critics. One tactic is to engage journalists with abundant information that presents an alternate point of view.

Bunker Mentality?

David Silver, president of Silver Public Relations, says a common error is for companies to retreat into a “bunker mentality” and attack the source of a story rather than devise a potent response.

“When companies get in a distressed situation they often get into group think,” and start attacking in a counterproductive way, said Silver, who provides counsel on crisis PR, M&As, restructurings and bankruptcy.

Striking at the source of information, as Google does by encouraging reporters to avoid quoting Cleland, is not an effective strategy in this case, Silver said.

“They should be challenging him on the facts,” said Silver. “If he is wrong, refute him in a public debate.”

On the other hand, it’s no secret that nonprofits and issue-oriented groups can be proxies for larger interests. The Brussels-based Initiative for a Competitive Online Marketplace, which is funded by Microsoft, recently used its influence to get the European Commission to launch an antitrust probe against Google.

“It’s pretty common for interest groups to find or create third-party advocates and advocacy groups to carry their messages,” said Andrew Gilman, CEO at CommCore Consulting Group.

Kovacevich sent an e-mail to this reporter after an IBD article on Nov. 30 about the EU decision to investigate Google for search engine discrimination. The article quoted Cleland who said, “The EU antitrust authorities have concluded informally that Google is a monopoly,” among other things.

Kovacevich responded, “I’m pretty surprised that you bothered to quote Scott Cleland. Scott is no longer an independent analyst,” adding that “most reporters here in D.C. have stopped quoting him, or when they do, they are clear about his Microsoft and AT&T affiliation.”

Cleland responded, “They have done this many, many times (when) I am quoted.”

An article by PC World on Sept. 13 that covered a Cleland report about how Google is monopolizing markets was prefaced by an author’s note saying, “It has been brought to my attention that the source of this report, Scott Cleland, may not be a credible source of information — at least not as it relates to Google.”

“I am not the only person whom they try to use their power to censor,” Cleland said.

For example, in February 2009, Bob Boorstin, Google’s director of corporate policy, issued a statement apologizing for an e-mail he sent that urged a donor to reconsider its funding of Consumer Watchdog, a Google critic.

“We’re interested in the monopolistic power that Google has, how they are using it and whether it has disadvantaged consumers,” said John Simpson, a director at Consumer Watchdog.

Google has since backed off criticizing the group, says Simpson. When informed of the criticisms Cleland has received, he said it seemed typical.

“At some point if you raise questions they don’t like, Google does attempt to undercut your credibility,” said Simpson, who was formerly executive editor of Tribune Media Services International .

Cleland’s Many Hats

Cleland wears multiple hats and says he has never tried to hide his affiliations. He’s chairman of NetCompetition.org, whose members include major telecom and cable players. NetCompetition.org is on the opposite side of the debate from Google on how the Internet should be regulated by Washington.

Cleland also runs GoogleMonitor.com, a wholly owned Precursor subsidiary “dedicated to making Google more transparent and accountable.” Cleland also runs Googleopoly.net, also part of Precursor, where he posts much of his research and testimony.

Asked to respond to charges that AT&T and Microsoft fund his research, Cleland replied, “Like most companies, my specific client list at any given point in time is confidential and proprietary.”

In testimony before congressional hearings in the last few years, Cleland once said he “has done consulting for Microsoft.” Several times he also said, “My testimony today reflects my own personal views and not the views of any of my clients.”

“Three different congressional committees did not view the fact that I work for major companies that may compete with Google as disqualifying me from having an expert opinion on Google,” Cleland said.

Gary Reback, a prominent Silicon Valley antitrust attorney best known for spearheading efforts in the U.S. antitrust case against Microsoft, says Cleland is widely followed.

“A lot of his analysis is widely read,” said Reback. “I read it.”

For now, at least, the war between Google and Cleland will continue. Google keeps a list of stories on hand that have called Cleland “a payola pundit,” a “telco cheerleader” and “a paid sock puppet.”

“Google seeks to censor my analysis because they can’t refute the message so they seek to shoot the messenger by attacking my reputation and impugning my motives,” said Cleland.

Share
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply


5 − three =