Google employee’s misleading testimony prompts Consumer Watchdog to call for Wi-Spy hearing

Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:18 am

    Google employee’s misleading testimony prompts Consumer Watchdog to call for Wi-Spy hearing

    CEO Schmidt Should Go To Washington Under Oath

    SANTA MONICA, CA – Consumer Watchdog today asked the House Energy and Commerce Committee to hold hearings into Google’s Wi-Spying because a ranking employee of the Internet giant gave testimony that contradicted known facts about the company’s massive privacy invasion.

    In a letter to Rep. Henry Waxman, (D-CA) chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and Rep. Joe Barton, (R-Tex) ranking member, the nonprofit, nonpartisan public interest group said a Congressional hearing is necessary even though the Federal Communications Commission said it is investigating.

    “CEO Eric Schmidt and Alma Whitten, director of privacy for engineering and product management, should testify under oath to provide the America public with the answers it deserves,” wrote Jamie Court, Consumer Watchdog president and John M. Simpson, director of the group’s Inside Google project.

    “The best venue to get a full explanation under oath of what happened and its implications for a company whose entire business is based on gathering information about its users, is a Congressional hearing,” the letter said. “Google has demonstrated a troubling pattern of changing its story in public statements as it has offered explanations of why it gathered private data from wireless networks.  Moreover, it is clear that Whitten, who mentioned Google’s Wi-Spying in Congressional testimony this summer, gave a written statement that contradicted the facts.”

    Read the letter here:

    Whether Whitten’s written testimony was a deliberate attempt to mislead or if it was inadvertent must be determined, Consumer Watchdog said. “Whitten’s actions must be examined closely because in its effort to revamp its image and portray itself as a company concerned about consumers’ privacy, Google has promoted her to director of privacy for engineering and product management,” Court and Simpson wrote.

    Here is what happened: On July 27, Ms. Whitten, then Google’s lead privacy engineer, testified to a Senate Commerce Committee hearing about online privacy. She said that there was an “absence of any breach of personal data” as a result of the Wi-Spying activities, in which Google’s Street View cars gathered information from private wireless networks. However, based on an investigation by the French National Commission on Computing and Liberty it was already clear in June there had been a breach of personal data.

    “Google CEO Eric Schmidt should also be questioned under oath about the scandal,” Court and Simpson wrote.  “As chief executive he is ultimately responsible for the Internet giant’s approach to privacy.  He should have to explain what he means when he says Google’s policy is to go ‘right up to the creepy line.’ We suspect that such a cavalier attitude toward consumers’ privacy has much to do with creating the culture that encouraged Google’s Wi-Spy intrusions.”

    The letter said Consumer Watchdog was pleased with the announcement from the Federal Communications Commission that it is investigating whether Google’s actions broke federal wiretap laws.  It added that the ongoing coordinated probe by 38 state attorneys general should reveal any state laws that the Wi-Spy activity broke. Nonetheless, a Congressional hearing is necessary, Consumer Watchdog said. It is the best venue to get a full explanation under oath of what happened and its implications for consumers is a Congressional hearing.

    Consumer Watchdog has been working to protect consumers’ online privacy rights and educate them about the issues through its Inside Google Project. The goal has been to convince Google of the social and economic importance of giving consumers control over their online lives. By persuading Google, the Internet’s leading company, to adopt adequate guarantees, its policies could become the gold standard for privacy for the industry, potentially improving the performance of the entire online sector.

    – 30 –

    Consumer Watchdog, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan consumer advocacy organization with offices in Washington, DC and Santa Monica, Ca.  Consumer Watchdog’s website is Visit our new Google Privacy and Accountability Project website:

    , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    One Response to “Google employee’s misleading testimony prompts Consumer Watchdog to call for Wi-Spy hearing”

    1. Sarah Says:

      America”n” public. John did you read this:

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。