News Clipping

Rogue engineers flout Google privacy rules


Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    Rogue engineers flout Google privacy rules

    Google has fired an engineer for accessing the user accounts of four minors, according Gawker media. David Barksdale stalked and spied upon the teenagers while working as a Site Reliability Engineer at Google’s Kirkland, WA, office.

    “In other cases involving teens of both sexes, Barksdale exhibited a similar pattern of aggressively violating others’ privacy, according to our source. He accessed contact lists and chat transcripts, and in one case quoted from an IM that he’d looked up behind the person’s back. (He later apologized to one for retrieving the information without her knowledge.) In another incident, Barksdale unblocked himself from a Gtalk buddy list even though the teen in question had taken steps to cut communications with the Google engineer.”

    What are Site Reliability Engineers? According to Gawker:

    “Site Reliability Engineers (or SREs) have access to the company’s most sensitive data. Responsible for a variety of tasks including responding to technical difficulties across Google’s ever-expanding portfolio of products, SREs are given unfettered access to users’ accounts for the services they oversee, according to a former SRE who left the company in 2007.”

    Google told Tech Crunch this is the second time it has fired an engineer for privacy violations.

    Google says that it is “significantly increasing the amount of time we spend auditing our logs to ensure those controls are effective”.

    Good idea.

    , ,

    2 Responses to “Rogue engineers flout Google privacy rules”

    1. MORON Says:

      This is completely ridiculous.

      Absolutely EVERY single company has employees (systems administrator roles) who have access to the data they host (in order to effectively manage the systems), that’s just a fact of life.

      The fact that Google actively monitors the actions of its employees and then fires them for any breaches is a positive thing.

      Do you honestly think for a single second that the systems administrators at Microsoft, Yahoo, AOL, etc, have never abused their positions ???


    1. Tech at Night: Google, MySpace, Twitter, Privacy, FCC | RedState - 15. Sep, 2010

      […] scandal, which has triggered criminal investigations in a number of countries. That goes double now that a much more egregious database leak has come out, in which a Google engineer was able to stalk a number of teenage boys and girls using full access […]

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。