ugg online shop sale ugg online shop sale ugg online shop sale adidas online store outlet adidas online store outlet adidas online store outlet coach bags buy online coach bags buy online coach bags buy online cheap ray ban sunglasses cheap ray ban sunglasses cheap ray ban sunglasses louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop buy louis vuitton bags online buy louis vuitton bags online buy louis vuitton bags online louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop tory burch sale reebok pas cher nike air max 90 comprar nike air max 90

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-includes/class-theme.php(9) : runtime-created function on line 63

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ready-backup/classes/req.php on line 9

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ready-backup/classes/req.php on line 9
Google’s net neutrality case fails to convince | Inside Google
reveal to you how to determine a faux nike shoe Share your insights and advice! This group is filled with members as interesting as they are diverse. If you want to ignore such type of mistakes, you should know how to identify a real silver ornament. I don have a big bust, but what I would suggest is to wear collared button down shirts tucked in to your skirt. Other than that, the songs are damn near identical. Your feet may be longer, your hands bigger. The suits that men wore at the beginning of the 1920s were of a conservative style. Girls have an inborn desire to get noticed with their unique fashion statement and they always remain keen to set exemplarylevels in styles. If you have any concerns about your own health or the health of your child, you should always consult with a physician or other healthcare professional. You can often find excellent deals there (and there is nothing wrong with it). Alexander proved himself as a commercially successful designer with the introduction of his widely famous "bumster" pants, named by McQueen for the extremely low cut waistline. With the exception of the Trovata suit, which ended in a mistrial, all of the lawsuits have been settled out of court. The bank is the oldest and largest bank headquartered in Philadelphia, Penn. Uncomplicated A line skirts and pants that flare from the knee are preferable, according to "The Dressmaker's Technique Bible.". The life of Joan of Arc is one of the best documented of her era. The cool thing about the online mode is that you can join games already in progress.. Since blogs are so popular these days, and traditionally offer a lower key, almost relaxed view of a photographer, this is the best place to see the real personality of your photographer. Another factor is the brand. Your pride in this profession would be that you are helping people feel better about themselves. The show has a pretty basic comedy mix to it with a good full feeling that has some minor moments of directionality when needed. Fashion and clothing are extensions of our personalities. They might sound strange but they are often dissected in the gutters. To give you a wider scope, the Ted Baker collection includes shirts, suits, trousers, sweaters, jackets, t shirts, ties, sunglasses, shoes, boots, sandals and sneakers for men. The shonen ai elements are an obvious nod to CLAMP's doujinshi fan base who thrive on it, but it also is a great comedic devise for Hokuto to play off of. A movie with lots of shots of Axel looking out of place in fancy hotels and galleries and country clubs.

Blog Post

Google’s net neutrality case fails to convince

Posted by

Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:21 pm

  • Share
Google’s net neutrality case fails to convince

As protests against Google’s changing position on net neutrality mount online (here, here and here) and at the company’s Mountain View campus, it’s worth parsing the search giant’s official response.

Written by Richard Whitt, the company’s  Washington Telecom and media counsel, the blog post purports to debunk “myths” about the company’s joint “policy framework,” developed with Verizon, for net neutrality.

The fact that these “myths” have gained currency so quickly shows Google did not prepare loyal customers for their policy change.

To complaints that Google “sold out,” Whitt replies, “We had to act.”

“But given political realities, this particular issue has been intractable in Washington for several years now. At this time there are no enforceable protections – at the Federal Communications Commission or anywhere else – against even the worst forms of carrier discrimination against Internet traffic.”

There’s a fair point in here. The failure of the FCC to set forth a clear regulatory framework results in understandable nervousness at Web companies. Google is being pro-active and insists it is open to input from other stake holders. (That’s what this barrage of criticism is: input from stakeholders.)

To complaints that Google has taken a step backwards, Whitt says, “it’s better than nothing.”

But in a break from Google’s past defense of net neutrality, the policy framework would allow for “additional online” services “distinguishable in scope and purpose” from public Internet service. Whitt insists competition and transparency would punish service providers who degraded basic Internet service.

Stacey Higginbotham at Gigaom has a more realistic view: “it doesn’t take a lot to see Verizon angling to protect its ability to profit over its control over its pipes.”

Electronic Freedom Foundation’s says the provision is “troubling.”

As for abandoning the idea of net neutrality on wireless, Whitt pleads short-term technical necessities of network management,  backed up by the long-term by the threat of Congressional intervention.

“Congress would always have the ability to step in and impose new safeguards on wireless broadband providers to protect consumers’ interests.”

But the whole reason Google acted now was because of the inability of Congress to reach agreement on what Internet safeguards should be.

“Fail,” says EFF.

“Neutrality should be the rule for all services, and a distinction between wired and wireless not only defies reason, it also abandons the portion of the Internet that is currently most lacking in openness and neutrality.”

It’s a myth that the agreement would open up the “cannibalization” of the public Internet, claims Whitt. There would be protections in place, he says.

To even adopt the vocabulary of “the public Internet” is ominous, notes Dan Gillmor at Salon.

Whitt’s claim that his deal is not about Google’s Android partnership with Verizon reflects the talking-point mindset of Google management, not engagement with reality. Google has found a level of corporate comfort with Verizon. It’s fairy dust to contend otherwise.

Finally, Whitt denies that Google and Verizon are “legislating the future of the Internet,” a claim that no one is making.

Google and Verizon are lobbying on the future of the Internet and their case isn’t too convincing.

Share
, , ,

This post was written by:

Margot Williams

- who has written 49 posts on Inside Google.

Margot Williams has more than two decades of experience in roles as investigative researcher, research editor, database editor, technology trainer and library director at The New York Times, The Washington Post, Gannett newspapers and Time Warner. She was lead researcher on two Pulitzer Prize-winning teams at The Washington Post for reporting on terrorism in 2002 and for an investigation of the use of deadly force by the District of Columbia police in 1999. Margot is the co-author of “Great Scouts! CyberGuides for Subject Searching on the Web” (Cyberage Books, 1999) and contributed to the “Networkings” column in The Washington Post for five years.

Contact the author

Leave a Reply


8 + two =