Is Apps for Government Ready for Prime Time?

Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:24 pm

    Is Apps for Government Ready for Prime Time?

    Google received U.S. government security certification for its Apps for Government products on this week, a milestone for the search giant whose quest for government cloud computing contracts has been marred by its failure to meet deadlines for converting the City of Los Angeles email system.

    The certification that Google meets the standard of the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) will help the firm compete with Microsoft for the $76 billion government computing market, says the Wall Street Journal.

    Microsoft and Salesforce.com, another cloud computing firm, expect to get FISMA certification too, according to WSJ.

    The central question, says ReadWriteWeb, is whether Google and other cloud-computing firms assuage the unique concerns of government agencies about security.

    TechCrunch reports that Google will be hosting Apps for Government data on servers that are segregated from its common ‘cloud’ and are housed exclusively on U.S. soil, two requirements of U.S. law.

    The FISMA certification is “a big step forward for Google,” says Mashable.

    But the history of Google Docs, the company’s collaborative word processing application, is not reassuring.

    Information Today reports that Google introduced a new version of Google Docs on June 15, “offering new but unfinished collaborative features, startling interface changes, [and] missing significant functionality.”

    Their conclusion, (confirmed by this blogger’s personal experiences) is that “Google’s Docs 2010 version was then, and remains a month later, not ready for prime time.”

    

    , ,

    This post was written by:

    Margot Williams

    - who has written 49 posts on Inside Google.


    Contact the author

    One Response to “Is Apps for Government Ready for Prime Time?”

    1. FISMA Says:

      Should web question the Department of Defense assessment on Google’s security certification based on that blogger’s “personal experience”?

      Really?!?

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。