House Oversight chair questions federal cloud strategy

Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    House Oversight chair questions federal cloud strategy

    As the Obama administration pushes ahead with plans to adopt cloud computing, Congress is pushing back with questions.

    Google is a leading proponent of cloud computing, where  most applications and data are on remote servers and accessed from a PC  via the Internet.

    Last week, Rep. Edolphus Towns, Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, responded to the release of a draft of federal cloud strategy earlier this month with a barrage of questions. In a letter to the General Services Agency which is overseeing the Federal Cloud Computing Initiative, Towns and Rep. Diane Watson, chair of the procurement subcommittee, said:

    “…there are no clear policies and procedures in place for cloud computing; that standards have not yet been developed for security, interoperability, or data portability; and that a finalized plan for the government-wide implementation of cloud computing is not readily available.”

    The gap between Town’s simple questions and the administration’s ambitious strategy indicates  suggests a failure to communicate.

    The Federal Cloud Computing Initiative presents a comprehensive scheme for conceptualizing cloud computing services and adopting them across the government. It calls for outreach and a communications plan. Unfortunately, the document lacks basic data about which agencies have adopted cloud computing and what they have gained or lost. Right now, the wizards of Obama’s  IT working groups are talking in a language (e.g. “the hybrid cloud”)  that the average bureaucrat, citizen and congressman can barely understand.

    Amidst the cloud computing boom, cautionary voices are being heard. Industry bloggers are calling attention to Five Big Weaknesses in cloud computing.  Ars Technica warns of the possibility, if not probability, of a catastrophic failure akin the Gulf oil well blowout in which massive amounts of data leaks uncontrollably and panicked consumers return to storing their data on servers in a closet down the hall.

    That doesn’t mean the government’s move to the cloud won’t or shouldn’t take place. But the administration needs to do a better job of explaining what this change means for government workers and the public.

    Rep. Towns asked GSA information officer Casey Coleman for answers by this Friday so we’ll soon find out if the Obama administration can bring the cloud discussion down to earth.

    , , ,

    This post was written by:

    Margot Williams

    - who has written 49 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。