Google Should Answer Some Searching Questions

Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:22 am

    Google woos people with its “don’t be evil” slogan and assures us that everything it does is meant to enhance our online experience. But a new study by US advocacy group Consumer Watchdog – of which I am part – has found evidence that the internet giant’s search results are skewed to its own advantage.

    With billions of web pages in existence and more being added every day, search engines are the gateway to the internet. They should be neutral – that is, their results should be comprehensive, impartial and based solely on relevance.

    In the US, Google is used by around 65 per cent of people. In some countries its market share tops 90 per cent. Most people’s experience of the internet is determined by how Google lists its search results.

    In 2007, Google launched “Universal Search”, which blends results from its own sites, such as images and video, with what it gathers from trawling web pages. Our study found evidence suggesting that Universal Search is squeezing out Google’s competitors by producing search results that favour its own products and services. For example, many search results now display a Google map on the first page.

    We found evidence suggesting that Universal Search is squeezing out Google’s competitors

    Since 2007, traffic to Google sites has soared. In video, Google’s YouTube has increased its market share from 40 per cent to 80 per cent, while its rival Photobucket, which once had 20 per cent, now has less than 3 per cent. In still images, Google Images’ share has increased from 43 per cent to 55 per cent, while Photobucket has fallen from 31 per cent to 10 per cent and Yahoo has fallen from 12 per cent to 7 per cent. Google Maps had around 20 per cent of market share in 2007, but now dominates with 51 per cent.

    Of course, Google could be succeeding because its offerings are better than its competitors’, but differences in quality do not appear to account for such radical shifts in traffic.

    Google claims its search is neutral, but our study suggests it is not: you increasingly see what Google wants you to see and go where Google wants you to go.

    John M. Simpson is a consumer advocate with Consumer Watchdog, a non-profit, non-partisan public interest group with offices in Washington DC and Santa Monica, California

    , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    One Response to “Google Should Answer Some Searching Questions”

    1. wendy Says:

      I get the point of the article. I really do.

      I am in the search marketing field and a company I work with is now slowly, but surely losing ground to Google. The only thing we can do is hope to become better and that users will choose us over Google because our service is better – or more targeted toward what the searcher might be looking for than the service Google currently offers.

      At the end of the day what Google does is offer a service and they base their revenue on advertising. The site I work with is in that regard no different than Google. I am torn on this issue. On one side Google is taking away opportunities but on the other Google also provides jobs.

      Like I said. I get the point of the article – but I’m not sure I agree with it…

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。