Google Worth $1 Billion to Pa. Commerce

Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:47 am

    Google’s growth into an advertising powerhouse is well-known to Impaq — an online marketing agency based in Green Tree.

    Impaq has 40 clients, including Mercedes-Benz, Chase Bank and Tiffany & Co., which together spend $85 million a year with Google, the Internet search engine giant.

    Impaq CEO Richard Hagerty estimated the return on their investment in search campaigns run through Google could be as high as $600 million.

    “And all you’re doing is moving those little words up and down” on a computer monitor page that displays search results, Hagerty said Tuesday. “It’s the fastest-growing and most successful advertising method. It just goes up and up and up.”

    Yesterday, Google issued a report that detailed its claimed economic impact on businesses and states nationwide.

    The report said 48,500 businesses in Pennsylvania that advertise through Google or website publishers who feature Google ads shared in almost $1.28 billion in revenue generated last year. The dollar figure is based on estimates of sales generated from searches and ads, plus money the Mountain View, Calif.-based company paid to online publishers.

    Generally, for every $1 spent on Google advertising, the report estimates, a business brings in about $8 in revenue.

    Pennsylvania’s section of the state-by-state report noted Google’s growing presence in Pittsburgh, with 100 employees who work on advertising quality and product search functions and who develop products — such as Google Sky, which provides a view into outer space. The office will move in August from the Carnegie Mellon University campus to the new Bakery Square development in East Liberty.

    Nationwide, Google said it generated $54 billion in “economic activity” last year. That’s revenue, plus free ads that are provided to nonprofits. In Pennsylvania, 150 nonprofits got $3.3 million worth of advertising, it said.

    The report drew mixed reactions yesterday. The nonprofit Consumer Watchdog organization dismissed it as hype based on “cooked accounting” that counts benefits, but doesn’t consider the impact on some content providers and competitors who suffer from Google’s “monopolistic control of search.”

    Lorrie Cranor, a professor of computer science and engineering and public policy at CMU, wasn’t surprised by Google’s figures. The company “has become one of the top tools out there today for advertisers and publishers,” she said. “It’s one of the main search engines, obviously, and people looking for things don’t remember specific Web addresses. They Google it.”

    Microsoft Corp. said yesterday it doesn’t break down economic impact figures for its Bing search engine or other products. The Seattle-based software maker has a North Side office with 40 employees who work with small, local partner companies that, for example, build business applications or conduct training based on Microsoft products.

    Based on market research, “For every $1 of revenue that Microsoft earns, our partners earn $8.70,” spokeswoman Catherine Collins said. There are 3,700 partner companies nationwide.

    Claire Johnson, a vice president with Google, said the company’s products based on key word searches have helped smaller businesses “compete on a level playing field so they can grow.”

    Brett Satterfield said the Hard-to-Find Items website that he founded with his brother Derek beats Google’s estimate. “For every dollar we spend on Google advertising, we basically make around $9,” he said.

    They launched Hardtofinditems.com in March 2008 as an outgrowth of the family’s Rollier’s Hardware business in Mt. Lebanon.

    Traffic to the site featuring a range of merchandise, from garden tools to Steelers Crocs shoes, breaks down like this: One-third comes from Google search results. Another third is through Google “cost per click” paid advertising. The rest comes from Yahoo and other sites.

    “You’ve got to be relevant on Google to drive traffic,” Satterfield said.

    , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    - who has written 1 posts on Inside Google.


    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。