News Clipping

Google’s arrogant, self-righteous executives

By

Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:01 pm

    Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s recent speech to the Abu Dhabi Media Summit offers a revealing glimpse into the Internet giant’s corporate culture.  It prompts the question, do the company’s executives suffer from a dangerous self-righteousness?

    Fortune’s Jon Fort examines Schmidt’s mindset in his article, "Top 5 moments from Eric Schmidt’s talk in Abu Dhabi."

    During the presentation at the conference, a questioner asked Schmidt, "All this information you have about us: where does it go? Who has access to that? Does that scare everyone in this room?"

    Schmidt relied on the usual trust-us-we’re-Google response. "Would you prefer someone else?" he asked. "Is there a government that you would prefer be in charge of this?"

    But as Fort writes the question really should be, "Should we trust either" Google or government with so much data?

    Fort writes that "Google sees itself really differently from other companies." He quotes Schmidt as saying:

    “We see ourselves as a company with a mission about information and not a mission about revenue or profits."

    Schmidt’s statement prompted Fort to ask:

    "Will Google’s sense of exceptionalism give it an enduring moral compass? Or just a dangerous culture of self-righteousness?"

    Based on recent behavior, I’d say the Internet giant has already fallen victim to its executives’ sense of self-righteousness.  And, I’m far from the only one with that view.

    Over at Gawker Ryan Tate uses the Fortune report as a jumping off point for an article he calls the "Six Delusions of Google’s Arrogant Leaders."  They are:

    • It’s not about the money.

    • Google’s wealth means it "gets it."

    • Google must sacrifice user privacy to grow.

    • Users are hungry for Google synergy.

    • Google is a worker’s utopia.

    • The outraged users are confused.

    Tate reaches this conclusion in the Gawker piece:

    "Schmidt was right that there’s a lot of confusion around Google. Unfortunately for him, much of that confusion seems to originate in the company itself. Hopefully the Todd Jacksons of the company will have a chance to educate their peers on the realities of life outside the Googleplex. Eric Schmidt included."

    Couple an arrogant sense of self-righteousness with a don’t-ask-permission-when-you-can-always-ask-forgiveness method of operating and you have just described Google’s corporate culture.

    , ,

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。