Press ReleaseBlog Post

Consumer Watchdog Urges Justice To Include Search Manipulation In Google Probe

CONTACT:Posted by 310-392-0522 ext 317 or Carmen Balber 202-629-3043

Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:03 pm

    WASHINGTON, DC — Consumer Watchdog today called upon the Justice Department to ensure that its ongoing antitrust probe of Google’s business practices include an investigation of whether the Internet giant is manipulating its search results to favor its own products.

    The nonpartisan, nonprofit consumer group sent the letter to Christine Varney, Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Division, after news that the European Commission’s antitrust regulators were investigating to see if Google manipulated search engine results in an anticompetitive way. Also this week Internet company Foundem filed papers with the Federal Communications Commission with examples of how Google products were favored in its search results.

    Read the Foundem filing here:

    “We know and appreciate that your department is conducting an ongoing antitrust investigation of various business practices by Google, some of that related to the proposed Google Books settlement,” wrote John M. Simpson, consumer advocate. “Today I write to call upon you to ensure that included in that probe is consideration of how Google may use its search algorithms to manipulate Internet search results to favor its own products.”
    Read Consumer Watchdog’s letter here:

    Consumer Watchdog had called for Justice to intervene in the Google Books case on antitrust grounds last April, citing concerns about unfair access to “orphan works.”  Last week the Justice Department and Consumer Watchdog were among those opposing the settlement in a fairness hearing before U.S. Judge Denny Chin.

    With around 70 percent of the search market in the United States, Google is effectively the Internet’s gatekeeper for most consumers. Whether a website is ever visited can depend entirely on where it lands in a Google search.

    Google claims its searches are neutral, based on proprietary algorithms. It declines to open those processes to outside scrutiny. To anyone seeking to verify Google’s claims of fairness, the Internet giant remains an impenetrable black box, Consumer Watchdog said.

    “As part of your continued antitrust investigation we call on you to shine a light on Google’s black box, and require it to explain what’s behind search results,” Simpson wrote. “If, as it appears, Google is tweaking results to further its narrow agenda, this anticompetitive behavior must be stopped.”

    – 30 –

    Consumer Watchdog, formerly the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights is a nonprofit, nonpartisan consumer advocacy organization with offices in Washington, DC, and Santa Monica, Ca.  Our website is

    , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。