ugg online shop sale ugg online shop sale ugg online shop sale adidas online store outlet adidas online store outlet adidas online store outlet coach bags buy online coach bags buy online coach bags buy online cheap ray ban sunglasses cheap ray ban sunglasses cheap ray ban sunglasses louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop buy louis vuitton bags online buy louis vuitton bags online buy louis vuitton bags online louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop louis vuitton bag online shop tory burch sale reebok pas cher nike air max 90 comprar nike air max 90

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-includes/class-theme.php(9) : runtime-created function on line 63

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ready-backup/classes/req.php on line 9

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/insidego/public_html/index.php:1) in /home/insidego/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ready-backup/classes/req.php on line 9
Will City of L.A. jump into Google’s cloud? | Inside Google
reveal to you how to determine a faux nike shoe Share your insights and advice! This group is filled with members as interesting as they are diverse. If you want to ignore such type of mistakes, you should know how to identify a real silver ornament. I don have a big bust, but what I would suggest is to wear collared button down shirts tucked in to your skirt. Other than that, the songs are damn near identical. Your feet may be longer, your hands bigger. The suits that men wore at the beginning of the 1920s were of a conservative style. Girls have an inborn desire to get noticed with their unique fashion statement and they always remain keen to set exemplarylevels in styles. If you have any concerns about your own health or the health of your child, you should always consult with a physician or other healthcare professional. You can often find excellent deals there (and there is nothing wrong with it). Alexander proved himself as a commercially successful designer with the introduction of his widely famous "bumster" pants, named by McQueen for the extremely low cut waistline. With the exception of the Trovata suit, which ended in a mistrial, all of the lawsuits have been settled out of court. The bank is the oldest and largest bank headquartered in Philadelphia, Penn. Uncomplicated A line skirts and pants that flare from the knee are preferable, according to "The Dressmaker's Technique Bible.". The life of Joan of Arc is one of the best documented of her era. The cool thing about the online mode is that you can join games already in progress.. Since blogs are so popular these days, and traditionally offer a lower key, almost relaxed view of a photographer, this is the best place to see the real personality of your photographer. Another factor is the brand. Your pride in this profession would be that you are helping people feel better about themselves. The show has a pretty basic comedy mix to it with a good full feeling that has some minor moments of directionality when needed. Fashion and clothing are extensions of our personalities. They might sound strange but they are often dissected in the gutters. To give you a wider scope, the Ted Baker collection includes shirts, suits, trousers, sweaters, jackets, t shirts, ties, sunglasses, shoes, boots, sandals and sneakers for men. The shonen ai elements are an obvious nod to CLAMP's doujinshi fan base who thrive on it, but it also is a great comedic devise for Hokuto to play off of. A movie with lots of shots of Axel looking out of place in fancy hotels and galleries and country clubs.

Blog Post

Will City of L.A. jump into Google’s cloud?

Posted by

Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:06 am

  • Share

I spent all afternoon Monday waiting at the LA City Council Budget Committee to give the Council members my two minutes on why Google’s proposal to put the City’s computing into its cloud could be dangerous. In a nutshell: Security, security, security.

Moving public records — city emails, documents etc — to Google servers, taking them off City desktops and servers, is a radical move. That’s why the LAPD came down against the proposal until Google said it would create its own government cloud, give security checks to data handlers and get the California Department of Justice to clear the deal.   But only LAPD would be in the government cloud, there’s no room for the rest of City Hall and other City Departments apparently. 

Still, LA Info Tech or IT people want Google to take charge because they say they are not up to the task.  The head of City IT even hinted there’d been breaches of security already that no one knows about and claimed Google will do it better. My point was Google is in the business of delivering advertising, not securing information. Google needs to pay big damages if it breaches securty under the contract with the City. The City Attorney present acknowledged that might give Google some "skin in the game" but there’d have to be a contract renegotiation.

Council members Rosendahl and Koretz put Google’s director of Enterprise services on the spot about my questions. Bill Rosendahl, who used to host a popular cable show The Week In Review on Adelphia, said the back and forth reminded him of his talk show days, and he thanks Bernard Parks for letting it go on. Apparently that’s not the usual in City Hall.

Bottom line is the council members were unimpressed with many of Google’s answers, or that of city managers who said the deal wouldn’t really save any money.  The proposal went to the full City Council without the committee’s recommendation. Rosendahl asked that liquidated damages be added in cases of breach of security.

Google probably doesn’t care all that much about the $7 million the City will pay it per year to host City emails, documents and data in its cloud.  What Google wants is to say the City of LA trusts us, and to get every other governmental entity to use its Apps.  That means Google will not only have our personal data, but our public data as well.  It’s a pretty scary concept for those of us who understand that Google’s goal is not just moving computing off our computers to its servers, but opening information to the world so it can market us better.  

The young Googlemen at City Hall talked about the reduncancy of data storage etc but none of us really know how Google’s servers or its cloud operates, or what it does with our data. That’s scary.  As little as I trust government, it’s job is to protect and serve, not to market me.  And I can get my government officials fired for misdeeds. So I trust government alot more than I trust Google.

I know Google’s piecing together a map about me every day from my searches, my map requests, soon my book choices re Google books if the Justice Department lets the deal go forward next month.  It wants to serve me up personal advertising based on my behavior. Well, I don’t want my behavior tracked by Google’s cloud, no more than I want my City records stored in Google’s cloud. How will it treat the public data, and what will it seek to learn about me from it to better personalize its pitches and maximize its services?

As much as I love Google, I fear it. And so should the City Council.  We will find out at next week’s City Council meeting whether the City will put adequate "skin in the game" for Google should it breach security. Right now the contract with the city comes through an intermediary corporation, so Google does not appear to be on the hook at all, let alone for big damages.  The contact is ambiguous and needs to become clearer.

I was filling in this week for my dogged colleague John Simpson, who was in DC yesterday meeting with Google and privacy advocates over Google’s behavioral advertising initiative and the need for privacy controls in it.  It’s good Google’s talking to us again.  The company shut down communication when we blew the whistle on their lobbying over medical privacy issues, arguing Google lobbyists weren’t there until the lobbying reports came out and showed they were.  Google’s government relations exec Bob Boorstin emailed our funder, The Rose Foundation, to ask them to stop our funding. Ironically, Boorstin was identified in a CNN Money story today as "a former Clinton White House speechwriter who works on freedom of expression issues in Google’s Washington, D.C., office."   Freedom of expression, unless you are expressing concerns about Google apparently. It’s things like that that make me worry about Google and its claims.  Any company whose motto is "Don’t be evil," has got to have some evil to hide.

Google also got a little annoyed last week when we showed the City Council disclosures to shareholders making the case Google’s cloud was vulnerable to viruses, worms, earthquakes, terror attacks etc. So Google sent a "fact check" memo around City Hall citing a Wall Street Journal story about us. The memo highlighted our defense of blowing the whistle on Google’s "rumored lobbying" but left out the part of the story talking about Google’s attempts to defund us or the other positive parts regarding the pressure Consumer Watchdog’s generated. Again, Google’s got some evil in it afterall.

John Simpson went away from DC yesterday feeling like Google actually was going to take a stab at doing the right thing to put privacy controls on its products.  But to help them we’ll have to sign a non disclosure agreement.   Which apparently you have to do just to get into a certain part of Google’s offices.  John declined the non disclosure agreement at the office, but they let him in anyway for the meeting. It’s so interesting how a company that is so interested in making all our information available takes such precautions to guard its own secrets.

, , , , , , , , , ,

This post was written by:

Jamie Court

- who has written 26 posts on Inside Google.

Jamie Court is the author of The Progressive's Guide to Raising Hell and the President of Consumer Watchdog, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to providing an effective voice for taxpayers and consumers in an era when special interests dominate public discourse, government and politics. Visit us on Facebook and Twitter.

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

nine − 2 =