Blog Post

Following the money in L.A.’s proposed Google email deal

Posted by

Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:25 pm

    L.A. City council is wrestling with a proposal to shift the city’s 30,000 email users and other computer applications to a system provided by Google.  Anytime a deal like this is under consideration, it’s worth checking the money trail.

    I examined records kept by the Los Angeles Ethics Commission to see who paid what to whom.

    The actual contract under discussion would be with Computer Sciences Corp. (CSC), which will be moving the city on to Google’s servers in a so-called "cloud computing" system.  Google’s Terms of Service (TOS) show up as an appendix to the main contract.  It’s as if you bought a new house and signed the contract with the moving company, not the home’s seller, but I digress.

    To help deal with City Hall, CSC hired the lobbying firm Arnie Berghoff & Associates on Jan. 1. Through June 30, the Falls Church, VA, company has paid $8,500 to the lobbyists. According to official filings, Berghoff was hired to:

    "Help CSC to navigate and understand the Los Angeles procurement processes; aid in developing and implementing a local marketig and visibility plan; aid in proposal development and in negotiating contract terms and conditions with the City of L.A."

    On July 1, Google hired the lobbying firm of Ek & Ek to represent its interests. Expenditures for the third quarter haven’t been posted yet.

    The proposal was considered on Aug. 11  by Council’s Information Technology and General Services Committee, chaired by Tony Cardenas.  Cardenas received a $500 campaign contribution from Ek & Ek on Nov. 16, 2005.  Berghoff contributed $500 on Nov. 28, 2005.

    The proposal heads next to the Budget and Finance Committee chaired by Bernard Parks.  Parks received a $500 contribution from Arnie Berghoff’s wife, Linda, on Feb. 26, 2007.

    Of course it’s not only Google and its team that throw cash around.  Arch-rival Microsoft also wanted to provide the city’s new email solution and representatives have been turing up at the ITGS meetings.  Microsoft’s reports they’ve spent $121,800 with Guerra & Associates since 2003  for help on "procurement issues."  The company reports spending $6,725 in each of the first two quarters of 2009.

    Whatever happened to submitting a bid and having it simply judged on the merits?

    , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。