Blog PostNews Clipping

L.A. delays consideration of Google email plan

Posted byBy

Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    Consideration of a proposal to move the City of Los Angles’ email and other computer applications to a system run by Internet giant Google was postponed this week.

    A report from the City Administrative Officer of the $7.25 million proposal was to have been discussed at City Council’s Information Technology and General Services committee meeting Tuesday.  The plan would move email and many other  applications from city-owned and controlled computers to Google servers.  The servers would be accessed via the Internet. Such a system is often called "cloud computing."

    With two committee members — Councilman Bernard Parks and Councilman Herbert Wesson — absent, Chairman Tony Cardenas announced the issue would be held over for two weeks.

    The controversial plan envisions moving the city’s 30,000 email users to Google servers, along with many documents. The Los Angeles Police Department has expressed concerns about security if the city makes the move. Both Tim Riley, chief of the LAPD Information & Communications Services Bureau and his boss, Assistant Chief Sharon Papa were there to answer questions.

    Meanwhile, in a letter to Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Pam Dixon of the World Privacy Forum warned about the plan. She wrote:

    "We believe that the City of Los Angeles has rushed into this without enough careful consideration of all of the consequences, and without enough attention to the details of protecting the privacy of the data contractually. We urge the City of Los Angeles to conduct a thorough analysis and risk assessment of all privacy and other confidentiality impacts that may occur, and we urge the City to protect its residents and itself from the many potential unintended consequences."

    A letter to the committee from Beth Givens of the Privacy Rights Clearing House also expressed concerns. She asked:

    •  "Is a cloud environment going to provide sufficient protection for such sensitive information?  
    • "Does the City’s stewardship role in regard to personal information preclude movement of personal information to a cloud environment?"

    She urged that the City consider "a rigorous privacy and security impact assessment " about the cloud computing proposal including  "a thorough risk analysis."

    I had planned to testify that "rushing headlong onto Google’s cloud will only ensure stormy weather in Los Angeles."

    One thing is certain, most of us there on Tuesday will be back in two weeks.

    , ,

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。