Press ReleaseBlog Post

Google Says It Loves Competition

CONTACT:Posted by

Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:23 am

    With Justice Department scrutiny over the Google Books Settlement only the the leading edge of antitrust regulators’ attention to Google, the company has launched a dog-and-pony show dedicated to combating the impression that more control is needed.

    In a presentation (PDF) acquired by Consumer Watchdog, Google public affairs lead Adam Kovacevich argued that Google is anything but anti-competitive. Its success comes from “learning by doing,” the presentation says.

        Google welcomes competition because it stimulates innovation, makes us all work harder, and provides users with more choice.

    This follows messaging that Google’s real market is all advertising, making it not dominant at all but merely a fringe player. InfoWeek interviews Wharton business school professor Eric Clemons, who says this is pure FUD:

        I consider antitrust action likely at this point. More to the point, so does Google. They have, not surprisingly, figured out the points that will be key and are already starting to address them.

        Google has gone right to the heart of the matter, which is if the relevant market is all of advertising, their position is inconsequential,” Clemons said in a phone interview. “If the relevant market is Internet search, then there is a very real possibility in their minds that they can lose an antitrust lawsuit. So they’re doing a massive disinformation campaign.”

    , , ,

    This post was written by:

    - who has written 1 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。