Press ReleaseBlog PostNews Clipping

Google University of Michigan Sign Digital Library Oversight Agreement


Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    Google has entered into a revised agreement with the University of Michigan over its rapidly expanding digital library, allowing the school to protest any pricing that the search-engine giant might impose on institutional subscriptions.

    The new agreement signed with the University of Michigan, which can be found here, seems tailor-made to refute the storm of criticism that Google has received over its digital library project, which has focused on scanning as many volumes as possible into an ever-expanding database.

    The New York Times quoted Google co-founder Sergey Brin defending the digital project, saying, "There was no option prior to this to get these sorts of books online."

    The University of Michigan can now object to any prices that Google sets for access to its digital collection, and moves any such disagreements to arbitration. The agreement also allows the school to keep digital copies of books that Google has scanned from other libraries.

    Google attracted more negative attention than perhaps it bargained for with its goal to digitize the world’s libraries. In April 2009, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, Consumer Watchdog, wrote a letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder asking the government to examine the settlement between Google, The Author’s Guild, and the Association of American Publishers (AAP).

    That settlement, Consumer Watchdog argued, deserved to be placed under government review because it gave Google the same financial terms of digital-book rights as any future competitor.

    Google had been attempting to scan "orphan books," or volumes under copyright whose rights-holders cannot be found, into its database.

    The next month, in May 2009, Google was challenged again by the American Library Association and Association of Research Libraries, which argued that Google had the potential to monopolize both digital books and readers’ privacy rights.

    In a court filing, the librarians’ groups asked for "vigorous oversight" of the deal between Google, the Author’s Guild, and the Association of American Publishers.

    Reports from that time had Google in discussions with the Justice Departmentover a potential antitrust case. However, such questioning does not automatically lead to legal action.

    Before Google’s annual shareholder meeting on May 7, Google CEO Eric Schmidt suggested that his company would have to be "more careful about when and how we do things" in the face of others’ antitrust concerns.

    , ,

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。