Press ReleaseBlog Post

Google Stands By Book Search Deal

CONTACT:Posted by

Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    Google has defended its online book deal amid reports it is being reviewed by the US justice department.

    An investigation is expected to examine whether or not the book search
    agreement with authors and publishers violates anti-trust laws.

    Google reached a settlement in October to create a $125m (£85m) fund to pay authors to have their work digitised.

    The deal still needs court approval and this week the deadline was extended to September for others to oppose it.

    Now that the justice department has become involved, Google has taken
    to the blogosphere with a post explaining the benefits of putting
    millions and millions of books online.

    "As the discussion continues, it’s important to
    understand what readers stand to gain," wrote Adam Smith, the director
    of product management for Google Book Search.

    In his post, Mr. Smith outlined a number of scenarios
    where readers could benefit. These include being able to access
    out-of-print, or so-called "orphaned" books where the authors cannot be
    found, as well as being able to get hold of more books in foreign

    For authors, Google also stressed the positives.

    "The settlement won’t just expand access to out-of-print books, either," said Mr Smith.

    "Because authors and publishers will have the ability to let users
    preview and purchase their in-print books through Google Book Search,
    readers will have even more options for accessing in-print books than
    they have today."

    ‘Monopolistic situation’

    The Google settlement was reached following earlier legal action by the
    Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers.

    That suit claimed that Google’s practice of scanning
    copyrighted books from libraries for use in its Book Search service was
    a violation of copyrights.

    Both organisations refused to comment on the story.

    The Department of Justice also declined to give a statement. Its
    involvement does not necessarily mean it will attempt to scuttle the
    deal, which critics have said would unfairly give Google an exclusive
    licence to profit from millions of books.

    Some librarians have said they fear that with no
    competition Google would be free to raise prices to access the

    Consumer Watchdog told the BBC it was one of a
    number of groups involved in calling on the Department of Justice to

    "We felt the deal set up an unfair monopolistic situation for Google," explained Consumer Watchdog advocate John M. Simpson.

    "We do need to have the world’s books digitized but I think there are
    very big concerns if one internet giant is able to dominate the digital
    market. We want a level playing field here," Mr. Simpson said.

    The deal currently only applies in the US, but Google’s
    Adam Smith said: "We believe that this will constitute an unprecedented
    test bed for the development of similar services around the world."

    , ,

    This post was written by:

    - who has written 10 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。