Federal Report Shines Light On Google’s EMR Lobbying Effforts

Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:23 am

    WASHINGTON – According to first quarter federal reports, Google participated in lobbying efforts aimed at allowing the sale of electronic medical records in the economic stimulus legislation.

    This contradicts the Internet giant’s earlier response to Consumer Watchdog, a California-based, non-profit consumer education and advocacy organization, that their claims against Google were "100 percent false."

    Consumer Watchdog reported the "rumored" lobbying in January and charged that Google was pushing for the provisions so it could sell patient medical information to its advertising clients on the new "Google Health" database. Google responded by contacting the Rose Foundation, a charitable foundation in California, about withdrawing Consumer Watchdog’s funding.

    Google’s report reveals a total expenditure of $880,000 on lobbying during the period including on "online health-related initiatives, issues relating to online personal health records, including in connection with H.R. 1: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009."

    According to the report, Google contracted with the Podesta Group a Washington-based government relations and public affairs firm, which independently reported receiving $150,000 to lobby for Google on "health information technology" and "online privacy."

    Law firm King and Spalding LLP, also independently reported receiving $80,000 to lobby for Google on "online health-related initiatives, including health information technology provisions in H.R. 1, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act."

    Consumer Watchdog executives say Google owes them an apology. They sent a letter Tuesday to Eric Schmidt, Google’s CEO, saying,  "There is a simple way to resolve this. Publicly release all the substance of Google’s lobbying efforts on H.R.1.  Google knows the drill: organize the information and make it universally accessible and useful."

    The letter ended by saying, "You owe us and your users a clear explanation of what Google was doing in the Capitol. As it stands now, the available record only leads to the conclusion that you were misrepresenting your activities."

    , , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    - who has written 1 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。