Consumer Advocate Jamie Court Cites Risks Of Electronic Medical Records

Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:48 am

    Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog, has pushed the patients’ rights movement in the United States for more than a decade by sponsoring successful laws in California. As part of his work for the California-based nonprofit, Court is closely watching Google’s and Microsoft’s entry into the electronic medical records field. He spoke with The Plain Dealer about patient privacy and his concerns in the digital age:

    How private are electronic medical records, especially those provided by companies like Google and Microsoft?

    If they are at your doctor’s office or a hospital, these are all systems that are pretty protected. There’s always the risk of theft, but that’s a remote risk. But what worries us is if you put your medical records on a Google server and you agree to share it with the wrong person, like the wrong vendor, then you’re in trouble. Most people probably don’t realize it’s dangerous. You just don’t want medical information floating out there on a cloud.

    Are there uniform standards or minimum standards for electronic medical records?

    There are some protections in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPPA, and there are some in the new stimulus bill.

    But several key protections are still missing:

    The prohibition on the sale of medical records is weak and full of loopholes. It also doesn’t apply to vendors, such as Microsoft or Google. Both companies have agreed to contracts that say they won’t release your information, but there is no law mandating that they don’t sell the information.

    The breach provisions requiring companies to notify patients when electronic medical records are accessed does apply to Google and Microsoft. However, there are safe-harbor provisions that let companies off the hook from the notification requirement if the breach occurred in "good faith."

    The federal law on the books only requires that patients are notified when their information was disclosed in the course of treatment but not how it was used. As a result, the patient will not know which hospital personnel looked at the information or for what purpose — so you won’t know if a nurse reviewed your file to look up drug allergies or whether the hospital’s fund-raising office reviewed the record for the purpose of requesting a donation.

    Will a patient have control over his or her own electronic medical record?

    You don’t have control over your medical records to the extent that you can change them or strike damaging information. But you should be able to get copies of them. You have about as much control over an electronic medical record as a paper record. But remember, it’s easier for an electronic record to fall into the wrong hands.

    Do the benefits of electronic medical records outweigh the risks?

    There are big benefits, like if you’re in an emergency room on vacation it would be nice to have someone be able to pull up your records and know that you are allergic to penicillin.

    Electronic medical records can also help with integration of care and avoidance of medical mistakes.

    It will also save a lot of money by preventing errors and it will help make medical billing more efficient.

    To reach this Plain Dealer reporter: or 216-999-4255.

    This post was written by:

    - who has written 1 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。