White House website responds to privacy concerns about Google; additional steps needed

Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    Twelve hours after blogger Chris Soghoian revealed privacy concerns about Google’s involvement with the official White House website, there is some good news.

    Although the steps taken by the White House webmasters don’t go far enough, they are steps in the right direction.  Here’s what happened:

    Federal regulations
    specifically say that “agencies are prohibited from using persistent cookies or any other means (e.g., web beacons) to track visitors’ activity” unless there is a “compelling need.”

    are bits of code placed on a browser when a website is visted. They are used for authenticating, session tracking (state maintenance), and maintaining specific information about users.
    According to the White House website’s privacy policy, The White House Counsel has issued a waiver to Google, allowing it to set persistent cookies on users’ computers when they view video files from You Tube that are embedded in the White House website.

    On Thursday the site went far beyond the stated privacy policy. Simply going to the page where the video was embedded put a persistent cookie on the viewer’s computer allowing Google to track the user on the government site.   After Soghoian’s post, the site was modified so that Google’s cookies are now set only when a viewer clicks on the video. It is also possible to download the video with getting a cookie.

    The White House apparently took notice of privacy concerns and acted. That’s a good thing, but in fact there is no “compelling reason” to allow Google to gather information about visitors to the White House website and to monitor WhiteHouse.gov visitors’ video choices, thus amassing more data for Google’s business purposes.   In addition, the fact that Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt is a major Obama  supporter creates the appearance of a conflict of interest.

    The White House needs  to rescind the waiver for You Tube immediately and halt this intrusive practice.  There are a myriad of ways to display video on a website without setting persistent cookies.

    , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。