White House camouflages ties to Google

Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    The White House webmaster apparently is apparently hearing concerns from privacy advocates about exemptions from federal rules for Google’s YouTube video service, but  I’m not applauding the latest response at all.

    In fact it disguises what’s happening, and down plays the relationship between Google and the White House, when what’s needed is complete separation of Google and state.

    Here’s the deal: Federal regulations prohibit the use of "persistent cookies" on government websites. Cookies are small bits of code sent to a browser that allow the user to be tracked.  When the White House website launched after President Obama’s inauguration, it featured Google’s YouTube videos embedded in the site.

    As noted by blogger Chris Soghoian, the website’s privacy policy first said that YouTube had been granted a waiver from the federal regulations and that a persistent cookie from Google would be set when a user clicked on a video.

    Trouble was, that wasn’t what was happening. Cookies from Google were set when a user merely visited a page with an embedded "YouTube" video.

    About  12 hours after Soghian’s initial post, the White House site was tweaked so that the reality matched the stated privacy policy: Google cookies were set only when the embedded video was clicked and a link was provided that enabled a user to download the video without getting a cookie.  I said I thought it was a step in the right direction.

    But guess what’s happened.  As reported today by Soghian, the old White House Website privacy policy specifically referred to YouTube. It said:

    "This persistent cookie is used by YouTube to help maintain the integrity of video statistics. A waiver has been issued by the White House Counsel’s office to allow for the use of this persistent cookie."

    You at least knew explicitly who was setting the cookie. Now the privacy policy has been scrubbed clean of any mention of Google’s YouTube and reads:

    "This persistent cookie is used by some third party providers to help maintain the integrity of video statistics. A waiver has been issued by the White House Counsel’s office to allow for the use of this persistent cookie."

    This anything but a move toward greater transparency.  If you’re going to grant exemptions to regulations, say who’s getting them.  And it’s not at all necessary to use YouTube to display video on a website.

    Google’s YouTube is the biggest and most popular of the online video services.  That’s probably why The White House has created a channel on the service where it is posting official White House videos shot with taxpayer money.

    But YouTube is hardly the only such service.  The White House needs to make its videos equally available to all such services.  Even worse is when the White House webmaster camouflages Google’s favored status.

    We all must insist upon separation of Google and state.

    , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。