Tag Archive | "business model"
Google faces questions from Congress; session should be public
Google is facing more questions from Congress. The Internet giant's deliberate circumventing of privacy settings in Apple's Safari browser -- that's the one used on iPhones and iPads -- is prompting the outrage. The deliberate privacy breach was discovered by Stanford University researcher Jonathan Mayer and reported first by The Wall Street Journal.
Continue reading...Google Hit With FTC Complaint, Says Circumventing Safari Privacy Features Accidental
Friday, February 17, 2012
The Consumer Watchdog advocacy group today asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether Google violated a previous privacy agreement with the FTC by tracking cookies in a way that circumvents default privacy settings in Apple's Safari browser.
Continue reading...Google’s Tracking of Safari Users Could Lead to FTC Investigation
Friday, February 17, 2012
Google's alleged circumvention of do-not-track controls on Apple's Safari browser could lead to big fines from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission if the agency. Consumer Watchdog, a privacy advocate that has been critical of Google, called on the FTC to investigate the company for unfair and deceptive business practices.
Continue reading...Stanford Study Finds Google Violated Privacy Choices, iPhone and iPads Targeted
Friday, February 17, 2012
Consumer Watchdog Says Internet Giant Lied To Users, Calls For FTC Action SANTA MONICA, CA – In the wake of a Stanford University researcher’s study that found Google has been violating people’s online privacy choices, Consumer Watchdog said today the Internet giant was lying to users and called for the Federal Trade Commission to act. iPhone and iPad users were targeted.
Continue reading...Consumer Watchdog Calls For Google CEO Page To Testify About New Privacy Policy
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
WASHINGTON, DC -- Consumer Watchdog has asked the House Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade Subcommittee Committee to hold hearings on Google's new privacy and data policy and to call Google CEO Larry Page " to explain his company's disingenuous statements about its supposed commitment to users' privacy."
Continue reading...Google’s Motorola Deal OK’d, But Regulators Vow to Monitor Patents
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Regulators on both sides of the Atlantic have cleared Google's $12.5 billion acquisition of Motorola Mobility, but are vowing to keep a close eye on the Internet giant's behavior after the deal goes through.
Continue reading...Consumer Watchdog Wants Larry Page for Privacy Hearing
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
The latest public letter was penned by Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project Director, John M. Simpson, and was addressed to the House’s subcommittee Chair Mary Bono Mack (R-CA) and Ranking Member G.K Butterfield, (D-NC). It starts: “I am writing on behalf of Consumer Watchdog to urge you to call Google’s CEO Larry Page to testify before your committee to explain his company’s disingenuous statements about its supposed commitment to users’ privacy.”
Continue reading...EPIC Pushes FTC To Get In The Ring With Google
Thursday, February 9, 2012
"We welcome and support EPIC's suit," John Simpson, consumer advocate at Consumer Watchdog, told the E-Commerce Times. "We called on the FTC to determine whether Google's arrogant, unilateral action violated the Buzz consent agreement," Simpson continued. "I think it's clear that it does."
Continue reading...EPIC Files Suit To Block Google’s New Data Policy
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Our friends at the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) went to court Wednesday to block Google from combining data gathered from its various services without users' consent.
Continue reading...EDITORIAL: It’s Time for Timeline — Facebook Changes Its “Profile” Page — For Everyone
Monday, February 6, 2012
In a Jan. 24 article in USA Today, Consumer Watchdog spokesman John Simpson criticized the way Facebook is handling the switch to Timeline. Including online giant Google in his comments, he said such companies are showing “a complete disregard for their users’ interests and concerns” and taking “an uncommonly arrogant approach not usually seen in business, where the companies believe they can do whatever they want with our data, whenever and however they want to do it.”
Continue reading...
Friday, February 17, 2012
0 Comments