Don’t Rush Robot Car Rules, Consumer Watchdog Tells Transportation Secretary Foxx

Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:34 am

    Don’t Rush Robot Car Rules, Consumer Watchdog Tells Transportation Secretary Foxx

    Put Focus On Enforceable Standards For Automated Technologies That Improve Safety

    SANTA MONICA, CA – Self-driving robot cars are not ready for public use and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) must not rush to implement regulations covering the vehicles as it updates its policy on automated vehicle technologies, Consumer Watchdog said today.

    In a letter to Department of Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx and NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project Director John M. Simpson also called for formal rulemakings to set enforceable standards for automated technologies that enhance safety.

    “Automated technologies – some of which are already being deployed such as automatic emergency braking – can clearly improve auto safety,” wrote Simpson. “Consumer Watchdog is concerned that success with such automated features could prompt NHTSA to prematurely recommend approval of the general public use of fully autonomous self-driving robot cars.”

    Last week Foxx ordered NHTSA to update its more than two-year-old “Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles.”  Updating the policy makes sense, Consumer Watchdog said, but is imperative that any updates continue to put safety ahead of all other considerations.

    Read Consumer Watchdog’s letter here:

    NHTSA’s current policy on self-driving robot cars urges the states allow them only to be used on public roads for testing purposes. Moreover, the policy says, “NHTSA strongly recommends that states require that a properly licensed driver be seated in the driver’s seat and ready to take control of the vehicle while the vehicle is operating in self-driving mode on public roads.”

    Consumer Watchdog’s letter stressed the importance of maintaining those key safety recommendations for self-driving robot cars as the policy is updated:

    “As you know, most of the testing of robot cars on public highways has taken place in California under regulations promulgated by the state Department of Motor Vehicles. The California rules reflect NHTSA’s recommendations and allow only testing of robot cars and then only with a licensed and trained driver behind the steering wheel capable of taking control as necessary.

    “We have closely monitored self-driving robot car testing in our state and there is nothing yet to suggest that the vehicles are ready for safe operation by the general public.  Nor is there adequate information to suggest that test vehicles should be allowed to operate on public roads without a driver capable of taking control from the autonomous technology when needed…

    “Do not put the interests of the robot car developers ahead of the public’s safety in the face of ongoing pressure from self-driving robot car manufacturers like Google, which has promised a vehicle without a steering wheel or brake pedal.”

    Consumer Watchdog’s letter also urged NHTSA to hold a public workshop to get input from various stakeholders as the agency updates its “Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles.” The letter concluded:

    “While regulations for the public use of self-driving robot cars are premature, there are automated technologies that improve safety such as automatic emergency braking and vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication.  NHTSA should open formal rulemakings to set enforceable standards as such automated technologies are shown to be safety enhancing and are implemented.

    “Innovation can thrive hand-in-hand with thoughtful regulation.  Your 2013 ‘Preliminary Statement Concerning Automated Vehicles’ is an example of just that approach and we are seeing the positive results as automated technology continues to develop. Google may want to put the pedal to the metal as it rushes robot cars out the door, but a thoughtful, deliberate approach to regulations is required. Consumer Watchdog calls on NHTSA to continue to put safety first as you update your automated vehicle policy.”

    Read NHTSA’s “Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles” here:

    – 30 –

    Visit Consumer Watchdog’s website at

    , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。