Consumer Watchdog Urges European Parliament To Approve Call To Break Up Google

Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:13 pm

    Consumer Watchdog Urges European Parliament To Approve Call To Break Up Google

    SANTA MONICA, CA – Consumer Watchdog today urged the European Parliament to pass a resolution calling for the break-up of Google to end the Internet giant’s monopolistic dominance, a remedy that the U.S. public interest group proposed more than four years ago.

    The Parliament is expected today to take up a motion calling for the unbundling of search engines from a company’s other commercial services.

    “It’s long been clear that Google uses its search results to unfairly advantage its own services,” said John M. Simpson, Director of Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project. “We proposed the break-up remedy to the U.S. Department of Justice in April 2010.”

    While the European Parliament doesn’t have the power to break up Google, Consumer Watchdog said passage of the resolution would increase pressure on the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, to take a tougher line on Google in its antitrust investigation of the company or through the introduction of laws to curb Google’s reach.

    Under former Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia there were three proposed settlements of the Commission’s four-year antitrust probe of Google, all of which were determined to offer inadequate remedies.

    Incoming Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager is deciding what to next.

    “The Commission should file a formal Statement of Objections,” said Simpson. “Breaking the Internet giant up into different companies according to the different lines of business is the way to go. We called for this back in 2010 and the need to do it has become even clearer as Google’s power has increased.”

    Consumer Watchdog said letters on Tuesday from senior U.S. lawmakers expressing alarm about the European Parliament break-up resolution missed the point.

    “Google got itself into this jam by its arrogant abuse of its tremendous power. I’m glad Europe’s parliamentarians see how dangerous Google is and are speaking out about it,” said Simpson. “U.S. consumers would be better served if our senators and congressmen did so too, instead of carrying Google’s water.”

    Read Consumer Watchdog’s April 2010 news release here:

    “Such action could include breaking Google Inc. into multiple separate companies or regulating it as a public utility,” Consumer Watchdog’s 2010 letter to the Justice Department said. “Google exerts monopoly power over Internet searches, controlling 70 percent of the U.S. market.  For most Americans – indeed, for most people in the world – Google is the gateway to the Internet. How it tweaks its proprietary search algorithms can ensure a business’s success or doom it to failure.”


    Visit our website at

    , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。