Press Release

Companies Press European Antitrust Regulators To Act Against Google

CONTACT:

Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:02 pm

    Companies Press European Antitrust Regulators To Act Against Google

    Eleven Internet Companies are pressing European antitrust regulators to take strong action against Google so that the Internet giant’s smaller rivals aren’t hurt. And what happens across the pond in this case could have an impact on possible antitrust action in the United States.

    The companies, organized by the British shopping comparison website Foundem, sent a letter to European competition commissioner, Joaquin Almunia saying that they  “are becoming increasingly concerned that effective and future-proof remedies might not emerge through settlement discussions alone.”  They want a formal complaint to be filed. That has a way of focusing settlement talks.

    The EU opened its antitrust probe of Google more than two years ago.  The regulators have been negotiating a possible settlement with Google and in January the company proposed steps it would be willing to take to respond the regulators’ concerns.

    Supposedly Almunia and his staff are evaluating the settlement proposals.  If they think they go far enough they would be made public and “market tested” before the settlement was finalized.  The companies doubt Google will offer a serious remedy without a formal complaint.  They wrote:

    “We will respectfully withhold judgement on Google’s proposed commitments until we have seen them, but Google’s past behavior suggests that it is unlikely to volunteer effective, future-proof remedies without being formally charged with infringement. Given this, and the fact that Google has exploited every delay to further entrench, extend, and escalate its anti-competitive activities, we urge the Commission to issue the Statement of Objections.”

    The letter says that Google’s manipulation of search by promoting its own services while demoting the services of competitors hurt users by “degrading the user experience and limiting consumer choice, ” and “lay waste to entire classes of competitors in every sector where Google chooses to deploy them [search manipulation tactics].”

    Our 2010 study, Traffic Report: How Google is Squeezing out Competitors and Muscling Into New Markets, demonstrated how with the launch of Universal Search, Google favored its own properties and services in search results to the detriment of its competitors.

    Reuters, citing sources, says that Google “had offered to label its own services in search results to differentiate them from rival services, and also to impose fewer restrictions on advertisers” as part of a settlement with the EU.

    That wouldn’t be enough for the 11 companies — or me for that matter.  They wrote:

    “Google must be even-handed. It must hold all services, including its own, to exactly the same standards, using exactly the same crawling, indexing, ranking, display, and penalty algorithms.”

    The EU investigation could have significant impact in the United States.  You’ll recall that after an 18-month antitrust investigation, the Federal Trade Commission gave Google a mere tap on the wrist. However, several states led by the Texas attorney general have an open antitrust investigation of Google. If the Europeans demand and get meaningful changes in Google’s behavior, the state attorneys general will almost certainly demand the same here.

    , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.


    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。