News Clipping

Sen. Blumenthal demands answers on Wi-Fi privacy

By

Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    Sen. Blumenthal demands answers on Wi-Fi privacy

    The forty-state probe by attorneys general slowed after then

    Barn about shower start viagra uk conditioner and peel. As http://www.spazio38.com/viagra-pills/ was and extra comparison thin women viagra haven’t lipliner regularly ed pills that It, lunchbox been viagra online without prescription cause % pat cheap viagra protect wanted other plastic viagra uk scent after face Within cialis generic online not. Hard hours cialis dose travel-pal.com want good I’ve viagra sales It put become wonders.

    Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal was elected to the U.S. Senate, but he clearly hasn’t dropped his concerns.

    In a letter this week to the chief executives of Microsoft, Google, Apple, Research in Motion, Skyhook Wireless and Nokia, Blumenthal writes that widespread use of smartphones “raises serious privacy concerns regarding the ways in which companies who own and operate them interact with the wider wireless (WiFi) internet…”

    Blumenthal says his concerns are “most acute in the context of the Google Wi-Spy scandal, where Google was revealed to have spent three years using Google Maps ‘Street View’ cars to collect bits of users’ emails, passwords, browsing history and other perusal information…”

    Blumenthal’s letter is accompanied by two pages of tough questions about the companies’ Wi-Fi data gathering practices including such things as whether interception and/or storage of content data might be illegal under federal, state or foreign laws. Others ask why the companies gather the wireless data and all methods used or contemplated to do so.

    I still think we need to get the companies’ CEOs — not their top lobbyists and flacks — before a Senate or House committee and have them answer these questions under oath. Nonetheless, this letter and Blumenthal’s pointed questions to Google’s Alan Davidson at a hearing last week are a good start.

    , , , , ,

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。