Connecticut AG’s Wi-Spy Deal With Google Shows Need for Congressional Hearings, Consumer Watchdog Says

Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:56 pm

    Connecticut AG’s Wi-Spy Deal With Google Shows Need for Congressional Hearings, Consumer Watchdog Says

    SANTA MONICA, CA — Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen’s deal with Google announced today makes it clear that Congressional hearings will be necessary if the American public is to understand fully what happened in the Wi-Spy scandal, Consumer Watchdog said.

    Google agreed to admit its Street View cars had collected private user information including URLs of requested Web pages, partial or complete email communications or other information, but won’t give the AG what it collected. The stipulation will avoid going to court as settlement negotiations continue, Jepsen said. He is coordinating a 40-state probe into the Wi-Spy incident.

    “The details of the biggest privacy breach in history shouldn’t be settled in secret,” said John M. Simpson, director of Consumer Watchdog’s Inside Google Project. “This makes it clear why Google CEO Eric Schmidt needs to testify under oath before Congress about Wi-Spy.”

    Consumer Watchdog this weekend released a satirical video to underscore the need for Congressional hearings.  It is available on the Internet and is being displayed on a digital ad truck in Washington, DC this weekend.

    View the video here: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/video/mr-schmidt-goes-washington

    Google also faces a class action suit over Wi-Spy in U.S. District Court in San Jose, CA.

    Consumer Watchdog seeks to have Schmidt answer questions such as:

    • Why did Google gather data from the Wi-Fi networks?
    • What plans were there to use the data?
    • Who authorized the project and supervised it?
    • Who at Google has used, analyzed or otherwise accessed payload data and for what purpose?
    • If the data was collected “by accident,” why did Google seek a patent on the process that was used to gather the data?
    • How can Google assure us this won’t happen again?
    • How many Americans’ private information was collected by Google?
    • What kind of information was collected? Emails, passwords, financial information, medical data, searches, videos? What else?

    Consumer Watchdog has been working to protect consumers’ online privacy rights and educate them about the issues through its Inside Google Project. The goal has been to convince Google of the social and economic importance of giving consumers control over their online lives. By persuading Google, the Internet’s leading company, to adopt adequate guarantees, its policies could become the gold standard for privacy for the industry, potentially improving the performance of the entire online sector.

    – 30 –

    Consumer Watchdog, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan consumer advocacy organization with offices in Washington, DC and Santa Monica, Ca.  Consumer Watchdog’s website is www.ConsumerWatchdog.org. Visit our new Google Privacy and Accountability Project website: http://insidegoogle.com

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    This post was written by:

    John M. Simpson

    - who has written 414 posts on Inside Google.


    Contact the author

    2 Responses to “Connecticut AG’s Wi-Spy Deal With Google Shows Need for Congressional Hearings, Consumer Watchdog Says”

    1. Pavlicko Says:

      I’m not holding my breath for the Schmidt hearing. I think a more likely scenario is that he winds up working for the current administration – or the CIA.

    Trackbacks/Pingbacks

    1. Watchdog Group questions Google's relationship with NSA - 02. Feb, 2011

      […] […]

    Leave a Reply

    ルイヴィトンは旅行の芸術なので、ルイヴィトンは比較的人気の高いブランドで、現在は手動で機械的に混合してパッケージングを行っています。 ルイヴィトンiphoneケースの海外での価格は、国民に比較的近いです。 しかし、エルメスは異なっています。馬が馬を生産するのは初めてです。そのため、エルメスは主に手作りの芸術であり、一般的な意味では贅沢ではありません。 エルメスiphoneケースのすべての製品は、芸術作品として楽しんで保存することができます。 ルイ?ヴィトンは、価格面ではルイ?ヴィトンよりもはるかに高いですが、質の面ではそれほど優れているわけではありませんが、近年では生産の増加により衰退の兆しが見えてきました。 最も顕著なパフォーマンスは、ブランド携帯ケース伝統的に手作業で加工された部品の多くが現在機械加工されていることです。加工の質は向上しますが、機械と労働は必ずしも成績ではありません。